Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This essay reviews Parallel Societies of International Students in Australia (Gomes, Catherine. 2021. Parallel Societies of International Students in Australia: Connections, Disconnections, and a Global Pandemic , 1st ed. United Kingdom: Routledge), International Students at US Community Colleges (Malveaux, Gregory F., and Krishna Bista, eds. 2021. International Students at US Community Colleges Opportunities, Challenges, and Successes . London: Routledge), and International Students from Asia in Canadian Universities (Kim, Ann H., Elizabeth Buckner, and Jean Michel Montsion, eds. 2023. International Students from Asia in Canadian Universities : Institutional Challenges at the Intersection of Internationalization, Inclusion, and Racialization . 1st ed. New York: Routledge). Collectively, the books elucidate the social and institutional conditions that govern the experiences and coping strategies of international students in three popular study-abroad destination countries: the United States, Canada, and Australia. Through interdisciplinary lenses (e.g., policy analysis, critical race theory, and media ethnography), they examine the lived experiences of international students in terms of mobility, exclusion, and adaptation, highlighting the disjunctures between internationalization rhetoric and practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".