MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ISOLATED SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION IN YOUNG, MIDDLE-AGED AND OLDER PEOPLE – FINDINGS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC 24HOUR ACADEMIC BLOOD PRESSURE CONSORTIUM (I24ABC)

2025· article· en· W4410587588 on OpenAlexaff
Kathrin Danninger, Dimitrios Terentes Printzios, Charalambos Vlachopoulos, A. Kollios, George S. Stergiou, Sola Aoun Bahous, Antonis Argyris, Athanase D. Protogerou, Enrique Rodilla, Marco Antônio Mota Gomes, Alessandro Maloberti, Cristina Giannatasio, Ronald K. Binder, Giacomo Pucci, James E. Sharman, A. De La Sierra, Pantelis Sarafidis, Jaques Blacher, Barry J. McDonnell, Daniel Piskorz, Sabine Perl, Lisa J. Ware, Aletta E. Schutte, János Nemcsik, Carmel M. McEniery, Ian B. Wilkinson, José R. Banegas, Mohsen Agharazii, Gary L. Pierce, Yan Li, Piotr Jankowski, Kazuomi Kario, María Lorenza Muiesan, Massimo Salvetti, Yi Zhang, Christopher Mayer, Bernhard Hametner, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Thomas Weber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Comprehensive hemodynamic data, obtained with 24hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24hABPM), comparing isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) with normotension (NTN) and the other hypertension phenotypes (systolic-diastolic hypertension - SDH, isolated diastolic hypertension - IDH) are sparse.Design and method: We compared steady-state (cardiac output – CO, total peripheral resistance – TPR) and pulsatile (brachial and central Pulse Pressure - bPP, cPP, Augmentation Index – AIx, Augmentation Pressure – AP, amplitude of forward – Pf and backward – Pb wave, estimated aortic pulse wave velocity - ePWV) hemodynamics, obtained with identical validated oscillometric cuff-based devices in a large academic research consortium, between ISH, NTN, IDH, and SDH across a wide age range. Hemodynamics were derived from brachial waveforms, calibrated with mean/diastolic BP, and processed with validated ARCSolver algorithms. Participants were divided into a younger (9-35 years), middle (36-65 years) and older (66-104 years) age group. Results: Overall, 8837 participants (47.9% women, 9-104 years old, 37.9% with treated hypertension) were included. Based on 24hABPM, 46.0%, 16.2%, 10.2% and 27.6% had NTN, IDH, ISH and SDH, respectively. ISH was rare in the youngest group (9-35years) – 6.8%, very rare in middle age – 4.7%, and more common in the oldest age group (66-104 years) – 17.4%. There were striking sex-related differences: the percentage of women with ISH was 10.9%, 68.4% and 65.6% in the youngest, middle and oldest group, respectively. Independent of age, ISH participants were characterized by the highest values for bPP, cPP, antegrade and reflected waves (AP, Pf, Pb), and ePWV, and the lowest heart rate (Table). In addition, young ISH participants had the highest CO among all BP phenotypes. Of note, middle-aged and elderly ISH participants had the highest LVMi among all BP phenotypes. Conclusions: ISH phenotype, based on brachial 24hABPM, is not unfrequently observed in a large multinational convenience sample, with striking sex-differences among young and middle-aged/elderly participants. ISH has unique hemodynamic features across all age groups, namely unfavourable pulsatile hemodynamics. In addition, LVMi as a common metric of cardiac organ damage is highest among all BP phenotyps in middle-aged and elderly ISH participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207