MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410595452 · doi:10.1093/ornithapp/duaf036

Wetter and more forested nonbreeding areas result in later departures but a faster spring migration in <i>Vermivora chrysoptera</i> (Golden-winged Warbler)

2025· article· en· W4410595452 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas J. Bayly, Sarah W. Kendrick, Ernesto Carman, María de la Paz Angulo-Irola, Yuly Caicedo-Ortiz, Stuart A. Mackenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueOrnithological applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsBirds Canada
FundersMissouri Department of Conservation
KeywordsWarblerSpring (device)GeographyEcologyBiologyHabitatPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Declines in migratory landbird populations require targeted research to identify the population-limiting factors acting throughout the annual cycle. Tracking studies provide data on migration timing and speed, which have been used to describe carryover effects of nonbreeding habitat use. To explore how variation in precipitation and forest cover among nonbreeding sites influenced departure dates and migration speed in Vermivora chrysoptera (Golden-winged Warbler), we fitted 69 birds with radio transmitters in Costa Rica and tracked them via the Motus Wildlife Tracking System. Capture sites covered a broad gradient of precipitation and forest cover and were separated by &amp;lt;100 km. Warblers departed Costa Rica during a 33-day window (26 March to 27 April, n = 46), and 23 birds were subsequently detected at Motus stations in North America, primarily in a narrow migration pathway through the Midwestern United States. Individual variation in departure date was explained by adults departing before immatures, males before females, and birds occupying drier (lower annual precipitation) and less forested sites departing 10 days earlier, on average, than those in wetter and more forested sites. Following departure, later-departing birds migrated faster allowing them to reach latitudes between 36° and 44° in fewer days and thereby catch up to and, in 28% of paired birds, overtake the earlier-departing bird. Our findings contrast with the general expectation that earlier departures lead to earlier arrivals along migration routes, instead providing evidence for alternative migratory strategies covering a spectrum of outcomes from earlier departures leading to earlier arrivals through to later departures leading to earlier arrivals. We present hypotheses for why these alternative strategies might exist within an optimal migration theory framework. Future studies in Costa Rica should examine additional proxies for habitat quality, to corroborate whether faster migration speeds from wetter more forested habitats are linked to higher habitat quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrnithological applicationsSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207