MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410595770 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-3806

Abstract 3806: Single-cell transcriptional mapping reveals genetic and non-genetic determinants of aberrant differentiation in AML

2025· article· en· W4410595770 on OpenAlexaff
Andy G.X. Zeng, Ilaria Iacobucci, Sayyam Shah, Amanda Mitchell, Gordon Wong, Suraj Bansal, David Chen, Qingsong Gao, Hyerin Kim, James A. Kennedy, Andrea Arruda, Mark D. Minden, Torsten Haferlach, Charles G. Mullighan, John E. Dick

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsComputational biologyCancer researchEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), genetic mutations distort hematopoietic differentiation, resulting in the accumulation of leukemic blasts. However, it remains unclear how these mutations intersect with the cellular origins of each patient's disease, and whether distinct sets of mutations converge upon similar differentiation patterns. Single-cell RNA sequencing has enabled high-resolution mapping of the relationship between leukemia and normal hematopoietic cell states. Yet, this application has been hampered by imprecise reference maps of normal hematopoiesis, or by small patient cohort sizes which do not adequately capture the extent of inter-patient heterogeneity in AML. To resolve this, we constructed a reference atlas of human bone marrow hematopoiesis from 263,519 single-cell transcriptomes enriched for rare hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). The resulting reference spans 55 cellular states and has been benchmarked against independent datasets of purified HSPCs. Using this comprehensive reference atlas, we confidently mapped over 1.2 million single-cell transcriptomes from 318 patient samples spanning AML, mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL), and acute erythroid leukemia (AEL) diagnoses. Single-cell composition analysis revealed twelve patient subgroups, each reflecting distinct patterns of aberrant differentiation in AML. Strikingly, some AML samples exhibited virtually no overlap in cell state involvement with one another, likely reflecting their disparate cellular origins. One subgroup was enriched for early lymphoid progenitors and featured co-clustering of AML and MPAL samples. Notably, this early lymphoid subgroup included an AML sample which eventually relapsed with lymphoid disease. To understand the genetic determinants of aberrant differentiation in AML, we quantified leukemia cell state abundance in >1,200 patient samples and evaluated genotype-to-phenotype associations to link >40 genetic driver alterations with their specific impacts on AML differentiation. This identified genetic drivers for unconventional lineage phenotypes in AML, including erythroid lineage priming associated with the co-occurrence of complex cytogenetics with TP53 mutations as well as lymphoid lineage priming associated with bi-allelic RUNX1 mutations. We also identified non-genetic determinants of AML differentiation. For example, we identified two subgroups of KMT2A-rearranged AML with distinct cellular origins reflecting either HSPCs or committed myeloid precursors. Last, we show that distinct leukemia cell hierarchies can co-exist within individual patients, providing insights into AML evolution. Together, single-cell reference mapping of malignant cell states provides a framework for understanding the impact of genetic alterations on hematopoietic differentiation across hundreds of individual AML patients. Citation Format: Andy G. Zeng, Ilaria Iacobucci, Sayyam Shah, Amanda Mitchell, Gordon Wong, Suraj Bansal, David Chen, Qingsong Gao, Hyerin Kim, James A. Kennedy, Andrea Arruda, Mark D. Minden, Torsten Haferlach, Charles G. Mullighan, John E. Dick. Single-cell transcriptional mapping reveals genetic and non-genetic determinants of aberrant differentiation in AML [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3806.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→