MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The central role of Pin1 in age-related cancer signaling pathways

2025· review· en· W4410595775 on OpenAlexafffund
George Xie, Sho Okuda, Jingyan Gao, Timothy Wu, Jessica Jeong, Kun Ping Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Cancer Biology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Institute for Cancer Research
KeywordsPIN1Prolyl isomerasePhosphorylationIsomeraseSignal transductionPeptidylprolyl isomeraseRegulatorExpansiveBiologyCancerCancer researchCell biologyChemistryBiochemistryEnzymeGeneticsGeneMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prolyl-isomerase Pin1 is a unique enzyme that catalyzes cis-trans isomerization of phosphorylated Ser/Thr-Pro motifs. These motifs are present in many proteins, where isomerization of the typically rigid prolyl-peptide bond can lead to conformational changes, and subsequently regulate activity, stability, or localization. The specificity of Pin1 for phosphorylated motifs allows it to serve as a master regulator of proteins after phosphorylation, adding an additional layer of regulation to intricately control cellular signaling. As such, Pin1 plays an expansive role in numerous cancer and age-related signaling pathways, and is recognized as a major driver of cancer and promising therapeutic target. In this review, we discuss the role of Pin1 in regulation of age-related cancer signaling pathways, and we highlight the early development and current landscape of Pin1 inhibitors, and the prospect of Pin1 inhibition for cancer therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Cancer BiologySame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207