MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410596185 · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2025.104466

“I felt so alone in the process:” Experiences of Indigenous women with maternal medical travel in the Canadian Arctic and opportunities for improvement

2025· article· en· W4410596185 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Fariba Kolahdooz, Se Lim Jang, Priya Patel, Claire Manning, Sarah Deck, Anika Juneja, Debbie DeLancey, André Corriveau, Stephanie Irlbacher‐Fox, Marie Tarrant, Sarah Cook, Adrian Wagg, Sangita Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueMidwifery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusInstitute for Circumpolar Health ResearchGovernment of Northwest TerritoriesUniversity of AlbertaAurora CollegeAlberta HealthCanadian Institutes of Health Research
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIndigenousArcticProcess (computing)The arcticMedicineNursingEnvironmental planningGeographyOceanographyComputer scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PROBLEM: Indigenous women face unique challenges during pregnancy/birth-related medical travel due to systemic barriers, cultural differences, and geographic isolation. BACKGROUND: In Canada, Indigenous women frequently travel substantial distances for pregnancy care and birth. Many pregnant women in Northwest Territories (NWT) are mandated to travel to urban centres with secondary/tertiary hospitals between 36-38-weeks gestation. QUESTION/HYPOTHESIS/AIM: What are the experiences of Indigenous women in NWT regarding pregnancy and birth-related medical travel? How do cultural and community-specific, culturally informed, and accessible healthcare practices influence the experiences of Indigenous women during pregnancy-related medical travel? METHODS: Across three NWT communities, 156 self-identifying Indigenous women who were pregnant or who had given birth in the previous three years completed a semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Qualitative data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis in NVivo. FINDINGS: Of the 55 women who travelled for pregnancy care, 68.5 % felt prepared for medical travel and 57.4 % had a positive experience. Of the 52 women who travelled for birth, the mean length of stay after birth was 11 days (ranges from 1 to 90 days), with 63.5 % staying ≤ one week. PARTICIPANTS HIGHLIGHTED THREE THEMES: Travel experiences, experiences with prenatal care and childbirth, and suggestions for improvement. The experiences involved loneliness, nervousness, logistical challenges, and communication and resource issues. DISCUSSION: Suggestions included improving cultural competency, expanding community healthcare, and incorporating Elder knowledge sharing. CONCLUSION: While many women reported positive experiences, improvements in medical travel and care access are needed to guide Indigenous maternal healthcare policy and planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0560.021
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0030.013
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMidwifery→Same topicTravel-related health issues→French-language works237,207→