Tissue-specific localization of the ING4 targeting subunit of the HBO1 histone acetyltransferase in the cytoplasm and nucleus of secretory cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Members of the INhibitor of Growth protein family (ING1-5) function as epigenetic regulators by targeting different histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) complexes to the H3K4Me3 mark of active transcription. The INGs recognize H3K4Me3 by specific interaction with their well-conserved plant homeodomains, and affinity can be increased by interactions between DNA and disordered regions within the ING proteins. They are classified as type II tumor suppressors since they are downregulated in numerous cancer types and knockout of ING family members results in tumorigenesis. ING4 targets the HBO1 HAT complex, which is known to affect acetylation of the H4 core nucleosomal histone, to affect local chromatin structure and knockout results in deficient innate immunity. Reports indicating roles in cell cycle regulation, tumor suppression, and apoptosis suggest that ING4 may be a promising target for cancer treatment by targeting pathways of innate immunity. Given the relatedness between ING4 and the closely related ING5 proteins, we have developed and characterized two mouse monoclonal antibodies to specifically recognize human and mouse ING4, but not ING5, to more accurately characterize ING4 levels by western, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical assays. Using them, we show that ING4 differentially partitions between the nucleus and cytoplasm in different tissues and localizes largely to the cytoplasm of cells having a secretory role in different tissue types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".