MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410607525 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.19.25327952

Deliver in the right place and get there in time! Healthcare-seeking behaviour for delivery in cases of stillbirths and neonatal deaths in rural Cambodia: a prospective cohort social autopsy study

2025· preprint· en· W4410607525 on OpenAlexaff
Kaajal Patel, Daly Leng, Sophanou Khut, Chou Ly, Arthur Riedel, Koung Lo, Claudia Turner, Verena I. Carrara

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsProvincial Laboratory of Public Health
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsAutopsyHealthcare deliveryProspective cohort studyMedicineCohortNeonatal deathVerbal autopsyDemographyCohort studyHealth careObstetricsPediatricsEnvironmental healthPregnancyCause of deathEconomic growthSociologyEconomicsSurgeryFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Perinatal mortality remains high in low-resource settings, with many deaths preventable. While clinical causes of stillbirths and neonatal deaths are often examined, non-medical factors such as care-seeking behaviour and barriers are less well understood. This study uses social autopsy to explore upstream, social factors associated with stillbirths and neonatal deaths in rural Cambodia. Methods A prospective, population-based observational study over three years (2019–2022) in Preah Vihear province, Cambodia. A social autopsy questionnaire to examine socio-demographic characteristics, health-seeking behaviours, and delays in healthcare-seeking was developed. The Three Delays model was used to summarise barriers faced by pregnant women at the time of delivery. Social autopsy interviews were conducted for all stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Data were analysed descriptively. Results Social autopsy was completed for 315 out of 404 (78.0%) stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Most mothers (87.3%, 275/315) reached a health facility for delivery. However, 20.4% (56/275) of them bypassed their nearest facility. Among women attending their nearest facility, 64.8% (142/219) delivered there, and of these, 69.0% (98/142) delivered within one hour of arrival. In total, nearly half of all deliveries (49.5%) occurred either at home (28/315), enroute (12/315), or within one hour of arrival at the first facility (116/315). Delays to seeking facility-based care for delivery were common: 65.7% (207/315) of women reported experiencing at least one delay type, most often at home (43.5%) or at the facility (36.7%). Conclusion Healthcare-seeking behaviour was generally appropriate, but not timely. Deliveries occurring very soon after arrival at health facilities likely limited the quality of care that healthcare workers could provide. Addressing home and facility delays may help to reduce these late-presenting deliveries, as well as reducing non-facility births. To improve the timeliness of facility arrival by pregnant women for delivery, we need to better understand the perspectives of families and healthcare workers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→