MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410609397 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324448

Integrated irrigation of water and fertilizer with superior self-correcting fuzzy PID control system

2025· article· en· W4410609397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPID controllerOvershoot (microwave communication)Control theory (sociology)Settling timeFuzzy logicComputer scienceNonlinear systemFuzzy control systemControl engineeringTemperature controlStep responseEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address the fixed-parameter limitations of traditional PID control (e.g., excessive overshoot, prolonged settling time, poor adaptability to nonlinearities) and the insufficient real-time adjustment capability of conventional fuzzy PID control, which relies on empirically predefined rule bases, this study proposes a self-correcting fuzzy PID control strategy for agricultural water-fertilizer integrated systems. Traditional PID control, due to its static parameters, suffers from reduced stability and error accumulation under dynamic variations (e.g., irrigation flow fluctuations, environmental disturbances) or nonlinear interactions (e.g., coupling effects of fertilizer concentration and pH). While conventional fuzzy PID control incorporates fuzzy reasoning, its offline-designed rule bases and membership functions lack online adaptive parameter correction, leading to degraded precision in complex operating conditions. To tackle challenges posed by uncertain variables (e.g., time-varying soil permeability) and nonlinear parameters resistant to precise mathematical modeling, this research integrates fuzzy logic with an online self-correcting mechanism, constructs a mathematical model for the integrated control system, designs real-time correction rules, and validates the model through simulations using Matlab/Simulink and a semi-physical PC platform. The results demonstrate that the self-correcting fuzzy PID control significantly optimizes key performance metrics: overshoot (reduced by 21.3%), settling time (shortened by 34.7%), and steady-rate error (decreased by 18.9%), outperforming both traditional PID and fuzzy PID methods in concentration and pH regulation. Its parameter self-adaptation capability effectively balances dynamic response and steady-state performance, resolving issues such as overshoot oscillation and lagging regulation in nonlinear dynamics. In practical applications, the system achieved an average plant height growth rate of 15.86%-21.73% and a 30.41% yield improvement compared to the control group, validating the enhanced synergistic control of water and fertilizer enabled by the variable universe fuzzy PID approach. This study provides a robust control solution with theoretical innovation and practical value for managing complex nonlinear systems in precision agriculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it