MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Finding northernmost baselines: high variability of above-ground biomass on Eurasian polar desert islands

2025· preprint· en· W4410613812 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vitalii Zemlianskii, Ksenia Ermokhina, Nils Rietze, Richard R. Heim, Jakob J. Assmann, Joel Rüthi, Nadezhda Loginova, Gabriela Schaepman‐Strub

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSwiss Polar InstituteAlberta Agricultural Research Institute
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)PolarDesert (philosophy)GeographyPhysical geographyEnvironmental scienceClimatologyGeologyOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the Arctic rapidly warms, a major change in its vegetation and biomass is expected. Understanding the current state of Arctic plant biomass is crucial due to its role in the surface energy budget and ecosystem carbon storage yet challenging due to logistical and methodological limitations. Arctic polar deserts are one of the most vulnerable terrestrial biomes on Earth, highly sensitive to climate change, and likely also the most understudied. During the 2021 Arctic Century expedition, we performed vegetation surveys and collected aboveground plant and lichen biomass samples at 8 sites on the Severnaya Zemlya archipelago, Franz Josef Land, Vize, and Uedineniya Islands, filling an important spatial gap in biomass measurements in the Arctic. For these study sites, we explored three different methods for estimating plant and lichen biomass: using 1) in-situ species richness, 2) in-situ cover, and 3) remotely sensed NDVI and plant cover. We found no relationship between total in-situ species richness and in-situ biomass, but in-situ lichen species richness significantly predicted lichen biomass. Remotely sensed NDVI had a limited explanatory power for in-situ biomass. However, drone-derived plant cover predicted in-situ biomass measurements well and could thus be used to effectively estimate landscape-level biomass of Arctic polar deserts. Our findings reveal that biomass varies widely among the sites, with an almost complete absence of biomass on Graham-Bell and Komsomolets islands, intermediate levels on October Revolution Inland and Pioneer islands, and maximum biomass found on Vize Island, although the results for this site are highly uncertain. Our findings could be used as a baseline to document future biomass changes in polar deserts. We propose our cover-based approach as an alternative to NDVI-based estimates of polar desert plant and lichen biomass and discuss its uncertainties and limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→