MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410613967 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.rvw.25.00052

The Epidemiology of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Children and Adolescents

2025· review· en· W4410613967 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Daniel Bouchard, Bianca G. Vescio, Mehnaz Munir, J. Raymond Gilbert, Russell J. de Souza, Jeffrey Kay, Darren de, Gita Wahi

Bibliographic record

VenueJBJS Reviews · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's HospitalImpactMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSlipped capital femoral epiphysisAvascular necrosisObesityIncidence (geometry)Orthopedic surgeryBody mass indexPediatricsEpiphysisObservational studyMetaphysisEpidemiologyLegg-Calve-Perthes diseaseDemographySurgeryInternal medicineFemoral head

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a growing global health crisis with significant health and orthopedic complications such as slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), a hip disorder characterized by the displacement of the metaphysis relative to the epiphysis. SCFE always requires surgical intervention to prevent severe outcomes such as avascular necrosis, gait abnormalities, and lifelong disability and deformity. Obesity is a well-established risk factor for SCFE; however, emerging evidence suggests that elevated leptin levels may independently contribute to the development of SCFE, regardless of obesity status. This systematic review synthesizes geographic, socioeconomic, age, and sex-related trends in SCFE incidence among children with obesity. METHODS: Searches of Embase, OVID Medline, and Emcare databases were performed from inception through October 1, 2024. Observational studies reporting the incidence of SCFE in children and adolescents with obesity (aged ≤18 years) across various geographic populations were included. Studies involving children with other chronic health conditions or animal studies on the physis were excluded. Study quality was evaluated using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies scoring system. Descriptive statistics were presented as absolute frequencies with percentages or as weighted means with corresponding measures of variance where applicable. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (5,467 patients) from North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania met inclusion criteria. SCFE patient samples ranged from 55 to 1,630, with some larger cohorts monitoring multiple medical conditions. The mean age was 12.0 years (SD = 0.4), and male-to-female ratios ranged from 1.43:1 to 3.12:1. SCFE incidence varied by region, from 50.5 per 100,000 (Sweden) to 0.33 per 100,000 (South Korea), with a pooled incidence of 9.62 per 100,000. Overweight prevalence was highest in Sweden (66%) and South Korea (67.6%) and lowest in Japan (11.8%). Unilateral SCFE predominated (68.4% to 90.6%). In situ screw fixation was the most common treatment, with 1 study reporting intertrochanteric osteotomy. CONCLUSION: Geographic variation in SCFE incidence suggests multifactorial influences beyond obesity, including socioeconomic factors, healthcare access, and genetic predisposition. Limited high-quality comparative studies and inconsistent BMI criteria highlight the need for further research to clarify SCFE risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJBJS ReviewsSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207