Back Matter ("Denis Renevey, an Annotated Bibliography - Christiania Whitehead", "Tabula gratulatoria", "Index")
Bibliographic record
Abstract
working on a doctoral dissertation, supervised by Professor Vincent Gillespie, on metaphors of love in the writings of Richard Rolle, with particular attention to the Cistercian commentary tradition on the Song of Songs.This topic informed several of the articles that he wrote in the years immediately following, published in 'The Medi eval Translator' and 'The Medi eval Mystical Tradition in England' series, and eventually culminated in his well-respected first mono graph, Language, Self and Love: Hermeneutics in the Writings of Richard Rolle and the Commentaries on the Song of Songs, published by the University of Wales Press in 2001.During this early period, Denis also published important articles on the thirteenth-century Wooing Group and the related treatise A Talkyng of the Loue of God, and essays on the Cloud-author, Margery Kempe, and Marguerite Porete -early fruits of the fascination with the Middle English mystics and with female religiosity that were to colour his entire scholarly career.A combination of these two interests led to the first of his many co-edited collections: Writing Religious Women: Female Spiritual and Textual Practices in Late Medi eval England (with Christiania Whitehead, 2000), particularly focused on anchoritic and Carthusian spirituality, and on The Book of Margery Kempe.Hidden amidst this varied output are two oft-cited articles on the devotion to the Name of Jesus ('Anglo-Norman and Middle-English Translations' 1996; 'The Name Poured Out' 1996).These were the early stirrings of an interest that was to come to full fruition many years later. 2002-2015From 2002, just three years before Denis's appointment as professeur ordinaire at the University of Lausanne, a new medi eval text comes into focus in his research: the little-known Doctrine of the Hert, a fifteenth-century Middle English translation of a thirteenth-century Latin treatise for religious from the Low Countries that became a devotional bestseller all over Europe.Denis focused initially on the Doctrine's astonishing use of household imagery and the strategies of its Middle English translator in a series of articles in the early 2000s.These investigations culminated in a critical edition of the Doctrine in 2009, co-edited with Christiania Christiania Whitehead (christiania.whitehead
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.193 | 0.104 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".