MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410621944 · doi:10.1093/europace/euaf085.364

The effects of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation on left atrial remodeling after pulmonary vein isolation - A cardiac magnetic resonance study

2025· article· en· W4410621944 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nikki van Pouderoijen, L H G A Hopman, Leontine E Wentrup, Joris R. de Groot, Michiel J. B. Kemme, C P Allaart, Marco Götte

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBiosense Webster
KeywordsPulmonary veinAtrial fibrillationCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineCardiac magnetic resonanceMagnetic resonance imagingIsolation (microbiology)Cardiac magnetic resonance imagingRadiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Although successful restoration of sinus rhythm after PVI is known to ultimately result in left atrial (LA) reverse remodeling, little is known about the impact of PVI on the dynamic progression of LA volumes and function during the blanking period, especially in the context of early AF recurrence. Purpose To assess LA volumetric and functional remodeling parameters using CMR early (<72h) and later (3 months) after PVI in patients with and without early AF recurrence. Methods This study involved 44 patients (61±8 years, 72.7% male, 68.2% paroxysmal AF) undergoing RF pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). CMR scans were performed before the PVI procedure, <72 hours post-PVI, and repeated 3 months post-PVI. LA volumes and strain were assessed using two- and four-chamber cine images (Circle CVI, Calgary, Canada). Minimum and maximum LA volumes were indexed to body surface area to compute LAVImin and LAVImax, respectively. Longitudinal LA strain was analyzed through the feature tracking model, subdivided into reservoir, conduit, and contractile strain. AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia episodes, detected either through 24h Holter monitoring and ECG or Kardia recordings, were considered early AF recurrence during the blanking period of 90 days post-ablation. Results LA volumes significantly decreased at 3 months post-PVI (Figure 1). Early post-PVI, LA function, as measured by LA emptying fraction (LA EF), LA reservoir, and LA contractile strain, showed significant reductions (52.5±11.1% to 48.1±7.9%, p=0.02; 18.1±4.5% to 15.2±2.4%, p<0.001; 8.3±3.1% to 5.3±1.7%, p<0.001, respectively). At 3 months, LA reservoir and contractile strain partially recovered, although LA contractile strain remained significantly lower than baseline (8.3±3.1% to 6.7±2.3%,p<0.01). Arrhythmia recurrence in the 90-days blanking period was observed in 13 of the 44 patient (29.5%). Notably, LAVImax reduced at 3 months in both groups, while LAVImin did not significantly decrease in the early AF recurrence group (Figure 2). Patients without early AF recurrence, exhibited improved LA function at 3 months as compared to early post-PVI, indicated by increased LA reservoir (15.3±2.5% to 17.1±3.1%, p=0.01) and LA contractile strain (5.3±1.8% to 6.7±2.4%, p<0.01), which was not observed in patients with early AF recurrence (Figure 2). Conclusion LA volumes significantly reduced 3 months post-PVI, indicating reversed atrial remodeling. While LA function initially declined, it showed partial recovery at 3 months, as LA contractile strain did not recover to pre-PVI levels. LA reverse remodeling occurred in patients regardless of early AF recurrence, however, recovery of LA function was only observed in those without early AF recurrence.LA remodeling post-PVI LA remodeling in early AF recurrence

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207