MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410632617 · doi:10.22215/etd/2025-16414

Learning Robust Graph Neural Networks with Limited Supervision

2025· dissertation· en· W4410632617 on OpenAlexaff
Abdullah Alchihabi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceGraphArtificial intelligenceData scienceTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated significant success in various graph-related tasks. However, their performance is highly dependent on the availability of sufficient, class-balanced annotated data and an accurate graph structure. GNNs are vulnerable to substantial performance degradation when confronted with limited annotated samples, class imbalance, or noisy graph structures. First, a Dual GNN learning framework is introduced for semi-supervised node classification under limited supervision. The framework comprises two GNN-based node prediction modules: a primary module, which uses the input graph structure to induce standard node embeddings and predictions, and an auxiliary module, which leverages spectral clustering to construct a new graph structure and learn new node embeddings and predictions. These modules collaborate to enable end-to-end learning of discriminative node representations. Next, a graph augmentation method called Graph Dual Mixup (GDM) is proposed for graph classification with scarce labels. GDM employs a graph structural auto-encoder to learn structural embeddings, applying mixup in the learned structural embedding space to generate new graph structures. Additionally, mixup is applied to input node features, generating node features for new graph instances. Together, these generated node features and graph structures contribute new graphs that increase the size and diversity of the labeled dataset, improving classification performance. To enhance robustness against adversarial attacks on graph structures, an Efficient Low-Rank GNN is introduced. This approach learns robust low-rank sparse graph structures through a two-stage process. In the first stage, Singular Value Decomposition is used to estimate a low-rank approximation of the graph structure. This estimate is refined in the second stage by jointly learning a low-rank sparse graph structure alongside the GNN model, resulting in enhanced robustness. Finally, to address class-imbalanced node classification, a Unified GNN Learning (Uni-GNN) framework is proposed. Uni-GNN integrates structural and semantic connectivity representations to extend the propagation of embeddings to non-adjacent structural neighbors and semantically similar nodes, facilitating the diffusion of discriminative information. Additionally, it incorporates a balanced pseudo-label generation mechanism to improve the representations of minority classes. Comprehensive evaluations on benchmark datasets demonstrate that these methods outperform state-of-the-art approaches and hold significant potential for advancing GNN learning with limited supervision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207