Long‐term home parenteral nutrition in chronic intestinal failure following metabolic and bariatric surgery and its clinical outcomes: A descriptive cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery is one of the most efficacious treatments for obesity. The increasing incidence of referrals to intestinal rehabilitation programs and the necessity for long-term parenteral nutrition because of bariatric surgery complications have gained attention, yet data remain limited. Our objectives were to (1) assess parenteral nutrition-related complication rates of patients requiring long-term parenteral nutrition because of bariatric surgery complications and (2) compare outcomes between types of metabolic and bariatric surgery. METHODS: This was a descriptive cohort (n = 25) study, which gathered data from patients enrolled in the national registry with a history of metabolic and bariatric surgery at baseline and 2 years and included demographics, biochemical parameters, parenteral regimens, line sepsis, hospitalizations, and functional status. RESULTS: In this study, 92% were women with a mean age of 53.8 ± 8.6 years. The most prevalent procedure performed was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (60%). Short bowel syndrome was observed in 40% of our cohort (n = 10). After 2 years, there was a significant reduction in the need for parenteral nutrition compared with baseline, with 37.5% of patients achieving weaning. No significant disparities were observed in the incidence of line sepsis, hospitalizations, or Karnofsky performance status between baseline and the 2-year follow-up, regardless of the type of surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was associated with lower body mass index at the 2-year mark. CONCLUSION: In post-metabolic and bariatric surgery patients, long-term parenteral nutrition is well tolerated based on clinical outcomes and functional status is not influenced by the type of surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".