MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410696062 · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00711-5

Results of a patient engagement training for health advisors: a study of self-perceived competency enhancements

2025· article· en· W4410696062 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Perez-Guagnelli, Nicole Jardine, Amye Leong, Chris Rao, Michael Cohen, Ana María

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Involvement and Engagement · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsToronto East General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeniorityMedical educationHealth carePsychologyMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the importance of patient engagement (PE) in the healthcare industry, especially throughout the product development lifecycle. However, there is limited research on the influence of PE training on the attitudes, knowledge, and skills of health advisors working in the life sciences, who have a substantial effect on decisions made throughout the product lifecycle in the healthcare industry. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a patient engagement training course tailored to healthcare consultants, focusing on changes in self-perceived knowledge, skills and attitudes before and after training. METHODS: Eighty healthcare consultants of varying seniority levels from a single company based throughout the U.S. and Europe completed a six-part online training course on patient engagement. The training covered various concepts, and the participants were assessed via a modified evidence-based practice questionnaire before and after the course to measure changes in self-perceived knowledge, skills, and attitudes. The study used paired samples t-tests and bivariate Pearson's correlation analyses to evaluate the differences. RESULTS: Following the training, the consultants reported significant improvements in their perceived KSAs toward patient engagement (PE). The most substantial increase was observed in knowledge scores, followed by skills and attitudes. These improvements were particularly notable among lower- to mid-level consultants, especially associate consultants. The training highlighted the need to further health advisors' understanding of PE and the opportunity training can provide. CONCLUSIONS: Patient engagement (PE) training significantly improves healthcare consultants' self-perceived knowledge and skills while increasing attitudes and promoting patient-centered approaches throughout the life science industry. This study highlights the importance of standardized PE training programs in enhancing healthcare outcomes and advocates for the integration of patient engagement in healthcare research and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.486
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.051 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Involvement and EngagementSame topicMental Health and Patient InvolvementFrench-language works237,207