MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410699309 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.o037

DOES BASELINE NEPHROTIC RANGE PROTEINURIA DETERMINE THE LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF MEMBRANOUS LUPUS NEPHRITIS PATIENTS?

2025· article· en· W4410699309 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Fadi Kharouf, Pankti Mehta, Virginia Carrizo Abarza, Qixuan Li, Laura Whittall-Garcia, Dafna D. Gladman, Zahi Touma

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLupus nephritisProteinuriaNephrotic syndromeGlomerulonephritisInternal medicineNephritisGastroenterologyImmunologyKidneyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O037 / #680 Topic: AS15 - Lupus Nephritis-Clinical ABSTRACT CONCURRENT SESSION 06: LUPUS NEPHRITIS – CLINICAL OUTCOMES, PREDICTION AND THERAPY 23-05-2025 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM Background/Purpose Management strategies for membranous lupus nephritis (MLN) are generally based on the severity of proteinuria. However, long-term outcomes comparing subnephrotic and nephrotic range proteinuria remain understudied. We explored whether baseline proteinuria level, subnephrotic or nephrotic, impacts long-term outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective study identifying patients with biopsy-proven MLN. Patients were categorized based on baseline proteinuria: subnephrotic (<3.5 g/day) or nephrotic (≥3.5 g/day). Long-term outcomes, including an adverse composite outcome (end-stage kidney disease, sustained ≥30% decline in eGFR, or death) and LN flares, were analyzed. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and associations were evaluated using Cox regression. Results Eighty-eight patients were included, with 49 (55.7%) in the subnephrotic group (median 1.5 g/day) and 39 (44.3%) in the nephrotic group (median 4.7 g/day). At baseline, the subnephrotic group had a longer time to LN onset, higher serum albumin, less diffuse podocyte effacement, and less frequent cyclophosphamide treatment (Table 1). No significant differences were noted in kidney function, urine sediment abnormalities, or histopathology. 38 patients (43.2%) experienced the adverse composite outcome, with no difference between groups (40.8% in the subnephrotic group vs. 46.2% in the nephrotic group, p=0.78]. Flares occurred in 35 patients (39.8%), with no difference between groups (38.8% in the subnephrotic group vs. 41.0% in the nephrotic group, p=1.00). Kaplan-Meier curves (Figure) and Cox proportional hazards model further confirmed these findings. Table 1. Patient characteristics at the time of LN onset (baseline). Figure. Conclusions No significant differences in renal disease characteristics or long-term outcomes were found between MLN patients with nephrotic and subnephrotic baseline proteinuria. These findings challenge current practices, suggesting a need for more individualized immunosuppressive treatment in MLN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→