Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many children have been and continue to be impacted by parents living with HIV/AIDS and disclosure of parental positive HIV/AIDS status to their children has multiple benefits. Research has been done on the prevalence and influencing factors of parental HIV disclosure however many identified gaps in research have not yet been fulfilled. The application of an information behavior theoretical framework may enable an opportunity to fulfill such research gaps. This is a scoping literature review that aims to align previously identified research findings to opportunities that may benefit from the application of information behavior theory. La divulgation du VIH par les parents: une étude de la portée sous l'angle du comportement informationnel RésuméDe nombreux enfants ont été et continuent d'être affectés par des parents vivant avec le VIH/sida. Cependant, la divulgation de la séropositivité d'un parent à ses enfants présente de multiples avantages. Des recherches ont été menées sur la prévalence et les facteurs d'influence de la divulgation de la séropositivité par les parents, mais de nombreuses lacunes identifiées dans la recherche n'ont pas encore été comblées. L'application d'un cadre théorique sur le comportement d'information peut permettre de combler ces lacunes. Il s'agit d'un examen de la portée qui vise à aligner les résultats des recherches précédemment identifiées sur la divulgation du VIH par les parents aux occasions qui pourraient bénéficier de l'application de la théorie du comportement informationnel et à répondre aux questions suivantes : 1) Quelles recherches ont été menées sur la divulgation du VIH par les parents ? 2) Comment la théorie de l'information a-t-elle été appliquée pour effectuer des recherches sur la divulgation du VIH/sida par les parents ? Mots-clésComportement informationnel; santé
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".