Exploring The Severity of Sleep-Related Cognitive Impairments Among Children with Familial Mediterranean Fever: A Narrative Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is the most common autoinflammatory disorder across both Canada and the United States. Children with FMF are thought to experience poorer sleep quality than their healthy counterparts. Sleep is a vital component of overall well-being and a strong predictor of healthy cognitive development. As such, the importance of understanding the cognitive impairments that result from poor sleep quality among this group must not be overlooked. Objective: This narrative review aims to synthesize relevant research findings to determine the extent to which cognitive development is influenced by poor sleep quality in children with FMF. This information can inform future intervention strategies to improve sleep quality and cognitive developmental outcomes in children ages 8-15. Results: Attacks of FMF are highly related to negative sleep experiences. Inadequate sleep deprives the childhood brain from undergoing necessary structural and functional developments. Sleep deprivation is thought to inhibit neuroplasticity, hinder academic outcomes, and give rise to a range of comorbidities. Unresolved, this issue can give rise to a myriad of developmental problems via disruptions in cognitive functioning, behaviour, and emotional well-being. Conclusions: This review suggests that children with FMF experience a wide range of sleep disturbances. To protect the cognitive health of children with this disorder, clinical assessment and support through behaviour or pharmacological therapy is crucial. By
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".