MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PREDICTION OF SLE FLARES BY MEASURING AUTOANTIBODY DYNAMICS: A NOVEL APPROACH FOR EARLY DETECTION AND MONITORING

2025· article· en· W4410715560 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bettina C Geertsema-Hoeve, Ellen D. Kaan, Tammo Brunekreef, Maresa Grundhuber, Linda Mathsson‐Alm, Arno N. Concepcion, Jacob M. van Laar, Maarten Limper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutoantibodyImmunopathologyInternal medicineImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV027 / #769 Poster Topic: AS04 - Biomarkers Background/Purpose Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by a highly variable disease course, including unpredictable flares that can lead to significant morbidity. Early identification of impending flares could improve patient management and outcomes. This study investigates whether measuring dynamic levels of autoantibodies can predict the occurrence of SLE flares. Methods A cohort of 100 SLE patients was prospectively followed for 2 years, with visits scheduled every 3 months at the outpatient clinic of the University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands. At each visit, clinical parameters were recorded, including the presence or absence of a flare, assessed with the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index. Additionally, blood samples were collected, and blood biomarker levels, including antibodies associated with SLE as well as calprotectin as a marker of neutrophil activation, were semiquantitatively measured using the EliA TM technology (Phadia AB, Sweden) on citrate plasma. To assess whether changes in these autoantibodies predicted the occurrence of a flare 3 months later, binary logistic regression analysis was performed. For patients who experienced a flare during follow-up, changes (Δ) in biomarker levels were calculated between baseline and the preflare timepoint. For patients without flares, the highest Δ value observed between any 2 time points was used (Figure). Figure. For no-flare patients, change in autoantibody values was calculated between all consecutive visits and the maximum Δ (ie, the maximum background dynamics in patients with stable disease) used. For flare patients, Δ between baseline and the visit prior to flare was calculated to assess dynamics preflare. aB2: anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1; aCL: anti-cardiolipin. p<0.05 statistically significant. Results The cohort consisted of 100 SLE patients with a median age of 50 years (IQR 39-57); 88 women and 12 men. Regarding ethnic distribution, 77 patients were White, 9 Asian, and 4 Black. Median disease duration was 18 years (IQR 8-28). Median SLEDAI score at baseline was 4 (IQR 2-6). During follow-up, 132 flares were registered, of which 119 moderate and 13 severe. In the binary logistic regression analysis changes in La/SSB (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.026-2.129), Ro52 (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.004-1.047), and Ro60 (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.007-1.076) were identified as significant predictors of a flare occurring within the following 3 months. RA33 IgA was inversely associated with flare risk (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.053-0.757) (Table 1). Table 1: Results of binary logistic regression analysis assessing whether changes in autoantibody titers predict the occurrence of flares 3 months later. Conclusions These findings suggest that the dynamics over time of specific autoantibody levels, particularly La/SSB, Ro52, and Ro60, can serve as predictors for impending disease flares in SLE patients. Additionally, the inverse association of RA33 IgA with flare risk indicates a potential modulatory role in disease activity. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this findings and explore their clinical applicability in personalized disease management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207