MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A NOVELLA OF MICE AND MEN: IMMUNOLOGICAL AND REPRODUCTIVE ALTERATIONS IN A PRISTANE-INDUCED MOUSE MODEL OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AFTER HORMONAL THERAPY

2025· article· en· W4410715617 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ekaterina Kurteva, Nikolay Gergov, Nikolina Mihaylova, Iliyan Manoylov, Andrey Tchorbanov, Ekaterina Ivanova‐Todorova

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePristaneHormoneImmunologyHormonal therapySystemic diseaseLupus erythematosusConnective tissue diseaseAutoimmune diseaseSystemic lupus erythematosusImmunopathologyAutoimmunityInternal medicineAntibodyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV013 / #145 Poster Topic: AS02 - Animal Models Background/Purpose Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by an aberrated immune response against nuclear, cytoplasmic and cell surface antigens. Symptoms often aggravate in females during their active reproductive years, indicating a significant interaction between the reproductive and immune systems. Given the urgency of understanding how SLE can influence female fertility and the role of hormones in disease manifestation, this study aims to investigate these questions. Notably, we utilize mouse models of SLE, a unique and valuable tool for studying the interactions of different systems and the impact of lupus development on oogenesis. Methods We successfully induced lupus-like symptoms in healthy Balb/C mice through intraperitoneal injection of the hydrocarbon oil pristane. The mice were randomly assigned to 4 groups (10 animals per group). One group of pristane-injected and another group of intact, healthy Balb/C mice were subjected to hormonal stimulation. Following standardized procedures of in vitro stimulation in humans, an exemplary short protocol was adapted to a prospective mouse model. One group of pristane-injected and another group of intact, healthy Balb/C mice were subjected to hormonal stimulation. The initial stimulation included 9 days of using products with a follicle-stimulating function. From day 7th to the final 11th day, the mice were subjected to stimulation with a Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, combined on the final day with human chorionic gonadotropin with luteinizing function. The dose conversion of the corresponding doses of all hormones was calculated using Equivalent Dose (HED) calculation based on the Km ratio. Control groups of pristane-injected mice and healthy animals were treated with PBS only. To follow-up on the immune status of these experimental animals, we utilized flow cytometry, ELISpot, and ELISA. The diversity of autoantibodies, histological changes, and oocyte quality were meticulously examined using fluorescent microscopy. Results A single intraperitoneal injection of pristane sparked the production of autoantibodies and led to the deposition of IgG-containing immune complexes in the kidneys, resulting in proteinuria. Notably, hormonal stimulation in the lupus-model mice significantly increased the percentage of proinflammatory immune cell subtypes, changed ANA immunofluorescence imaging patterns, and elevated the number of plasmacytes producing anti-dsDNA IgG antibodies. The ANA immunofluorescent staining was described according to the corresponding ANA patterns in humans, according to the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP). Additionally, depositions of IgG-containing immune complexes were detected in both the kidneys and ovaries of treated mice, alongside observable structural abnormalities in isolated oocytes. Conclusions The observed oocyte impairments in pristane-treated mice are compelling evidence of a disrupted local microenvironment due to disease activity. They underscore the critical interplay between autoimmunity and reproductive health, and their significance could influence future research and clinical practice in this field. This study was supported by National Science Fund, Bulgaria, grant number [КP-06-H53/8/2021] and the European Fund for regional development through Operational Program Science and Education for Smart Growth 2014 - 2020, Grant BG05M2OP001-1.002-0001-C04 “Fundamental Translational and Clinical Investigations on Infections and Immunity”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicEstrogen and related hormone effects→French-language works237,207→