MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

C1Q-MIMIKING SCFV FRAGMENTS BINDING ANTI-C1Q AUTOANTIBODIES HAS DISEASE-PROGRESSION EFFECT IN MRL/LPR MOUSE MODEL OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

2025· article· en· W4410715629 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrey Tchorbanov, Silviya Bradyanova, Nikolina Mihaylova, Nikola Ralchev, Alexandra Kapogianni, Ginka Cholakova, Ivanka Tsacheva

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutoantibodySystemic diseaseSystemic lupus erythematosusConnective tissue diseaseAutoimmune diseaseImmunologySystemic lupusLupus erythematosusImmunopathologyDiseaseAntibodyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV016 / #588 Poster Topic: AS02 - Animal Models Background/Purpose Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by tissue damage in multiple organs caused by autoantibodies and the resulting immune complexes. C1q is the first component of the classical complement pathway and primary or acquired C1q deficiencies are directly linked to development and severity of SLE. While the primary C1q deficiency is not frequent among SLE patients, 20-50% of them developed elevated levels of anti-C1q autoantibodies, which may be are responsible for low C1q levels. One possible way for complement system contribution to onset of autoimmune disorder could be realized by the impairment of C1q-mediated apoptotic clearance as part of human homeostasis. The capacity of C1q to bind early apoptotic cells could be decreased or even lost in the presence of anti-C1q antibodies which are specific for epitopes within gC1q. Methods A phage-displayed library expressing single-chain recombinant antibodies (scFv Ab) was screened to select scFv specific for anti-C1q autoantibodies from different sera of lupus nephritis patients. Such a monoclonal anti-idiotype scFv antibody selected from the Griffin.1 phage library was used to treat MRL/lpr mice. Two groups of MRL/lpr mice were used for in vivo and ex vivo experiments: disease free 7 weeks old mice and 16 weeks old animals with advanced disease manifestations. The mice were injected weekly with 20 µg/mouse of scFv A1 fragments binding anti-C1q antibodies. Blood samples were collected weekly and the sera were stored at -80 ºС for subsequent analyses. The number of in vitro and ex vivo studies with collected cells, sera and organs from the treated animals have been performed. The effects of therapy with the scFv A1 fragments were evaluated using flow cytometry, histology analyses, ELISpot and ELISA assays. Results An scFv specific for anti-C1q autoantibodies was generated and administered to MRL/lpr mice. Data show that scFv treatment changes the percentage of different B, T and NK cell subpopulations as well as plasma cells and plasmablasts in the spleen and bone marrow. An increase in the levels of splenocyte proliferation, anti-C1q antibodies, and the number of plasma cells producing anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies were also observed in both groups of scFv-treated animals. Administration of scFv A1 fragments binding anti-C1q antibodies increase the pathological findings in kidney histology in both young and sick animals. High levels of proteinuria and hematuria combined with increased unstable levels of IL10 and IFNγ promote the development of severe lupus and shorten the survival of treated MRL/lpr mice. Conclusions The treatment with anti-idiotypic scFv antibodies has disease-progression effect on lupus symptoms in MRL/lpr murine model of SLE. Binding of anti-C1q antibodies by scFv fragments neutralizes their ability to contact C1q, but the scFv is also able to bind B cell receptors on the surface of C1q-specific B cells, which enhances disease activity (Figure 1). Figure 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→