PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS OF SERUM OVER TIME TO FORECAST TREATMENT RESPONSE IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O061 / #515 Topic:AS15 - Lupus Nephritis-Clinical ABSTRACT CONCURRENT SESSION 10: INTEGRATING PROTEOMIC & TRANSCRIPTOMICS IN SLE 24-05-2025 10:40 AM - 11:40 AM Background/Purpose Lupus nephritis (LN) can cause severe complications and early mortality in SLE patients. Despite advancements, treatments for LN are not consistently effective and often have adverse effects. This study aims to develop a robust, noninvasive biomarker panel to predict treatment response, using high-throughput proteomics and machine learning to model serum protein expression, as part of the Accelerating Medicines Partnership RA/SLE Network. Methods Over 5,000 proteins were measured in the serum of 158 LN patients at the time of diagnostic kidney biopsy (baseline) and 12 weeks post-biopsy using Olink Explore HT. Clinical response was determined at 52 weeks as complete (CR; n=25), partial (PR; n=22), or no response (NR; n=49). Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, and genetic ancestry and machine learning algorithm approaches (Extreme Gradient Boosting) were used to generate a robust prediction model of treatment responsiveness. Results At baseline, patients with NR exhibited 515 (p-value < 0.05; 160 upregulated) dysregulated proteins within the innate immune system, platelet activation, and pathways seen in neurodegeneration compared to CR. In addition, 1227 (p-value < 0.05; 1180 upregulated) proteins involving the TGFb, IL-10, Th1/Th2 differentiation, platelet activation, and leukocyte transendothelial migration pathways at 12 weeks post-biopsy were differentially expressed in patients with NR compared to CR. Proteins involved in T cell proliferation, Th17 cell differentiation, and TNF, Wnt, EGFR, and IL-10 signaling were persistently elevated at week 12 in NR compared to CR using paired analysis. The proteomic profiles of CR and NR are easily distinguishable at 52 weeks (AUC, 0.85 ± 0.10 with cross-validation accuracy of 76.1% ± 10.2%). While the ML models at baseline and 12 weeks showed less robust prediction performance with 65.9% ± 7.6% and 70.4% ± 7.3% (Figure 1A-C), the model that incorporates the baseline protein levels and the changes from baseline to 12 weeks post treatment showed the most robust prediction with AUC of 0.89 ± 0.06 and accuracy of 81.5% ± 6.2%. In particular, patients with a CR had a significant reduction in CD27, VEGF, HAVCR2, MEGF11, and VSIG4 from baseline to 12 weeks post-biopsy (Figure 1D-E). Furthermore, preliminary trajectory analyses have demonstrated the rapid decline of these proteins before treatment with the levels plateauing near the levels seen in healthy controls throughout the 52-week of study trial. Gene regulatory network analyses of the top predictors demonstrated significantly downregulated lymphocyte activation/differentiation (CD27, IL-7, IL-3, IL-16, CD83, and IL-10) and cellular migration pathways (NRP1, IL-16, PDGFB, CSF1, DDR1, FSTL1) in patients with a CR at week 12. Figure 1. Conclusions Early downregulation of specific immune pathways upon treatment precedes future clinical response in LN. Changes in serum protein expression, especially the soluble surface receptors shed upon cellular activation, at 12 weeks post-biopsy may serve as noninvasive biomarkers of 52-week treatment response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".