MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410715690 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.o061

PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS OF SERUM OVER TIME TO FORECAST TREATMENT RESPONSE IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS

2025· article· en· W4410715690 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rufei Lu, Andrea Fava, Peter Izmirly, Ben Jones, Jennifer H. Anolik, Chaim Putterman, David Wofsy, Diane L. Kamen, Maria Dall’Era, Kenneth Kalunian, H. Michael Belmont, Richard Furie, Susan Macwana, Wade DeJager, Catriona A. Wagner, E. Steve Woodle, Michael H. Weisman, Mariko Ishimori, Paul J. Utz, Betty Diamond, Jill P. Buyon, Michelle Petri, Judith A. James, Joel M. Guthridge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLupus nephritisNephritisImmunologyInternal medicineSystemic lupus erythematosusDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O061 / #515 Topic:AS15 - Lupus Nephritis-Clinical ABSTRACT CONCURRENT SESSION 10: INTEGRATING PROTEOMIC & TRANSCRIPTOMICS IN SLE 24-05-2025 10:40 AM - 11:40 AM Background/Purpose Lupus nephritis (LN) can cause severe complications and early mortality in SLE patients. Despite advancements, treatments for LN are not consistently effective and often have adverse effects. This study aims to develop a robust, noninvasive biomarker panel to predict treatment response, using high-throughput proteomics and machine learning to model serum protein expression, as part of the Accelerating Medicines Partnership RA/SLE Network. Methods Over 5,000 proteins were measured in the serum of 158 LN patients at the time of diagnostic kidney biopsy (baseline) and 12 weeks post-biopsy using Olink Explore HT. Clinical response was determined at 52 weeks as complete (CR; n=25), partial (PR; n=22), or no response (NR; n=49). Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, and genetic ancestry and machine learning algorithm approaches (Extreme Gradient Boosting) were used to generate a robust prediction model of treatment responsiveness. Results At baseline, patients with NR exhibited 515 (p-value < 0.05; 160 upregulated) dysregulated proteins within the innate immune system, platelet activation, and pathways seen in neurodegeneration compared to CR. In addition, 1227 (p-value < 0.05; 1180 upregulated) proteins involving the TGFb, IL-10, Th1/Th2 differentiation, platelet activation, and leukocyte transendothelial migration pathways at 12 weeks post-biopsy were differentially expressed in patients with NR compared to CR. Proteins involved in T cell proliferation, Th17 cell differentiation, and TNF, Wnt, EGFR, and IL-10 signaling were persistently elevated at week 12 in NR compared to CR using paired analysis. The proteomic profiles of CR and NR are easily distinguishable at 52 weeks (AUC, 0.85 ± 0.10 with cross-validation accuracy of 76.1% ± 10.2%). While the ML models at baseline and 12 weeks showed less robust prediction performance with 65.9% ± 7.6% and 70.4% ± 7.3% (Figure 1A-C), the model that incorporates the baseline protein levels and the changes from baseline to 12 weeks post treatment showed the most robust prediction with AUC of 0.89 ± 0.06 and accuracy of 81.5% ± 6.2%. In particular, patients with a CR had a significant reduction in CD27, VEGF, HAVCR2, MEGF11, and VSIG4 from baseline to 12 weeks post-biopsy (Figure 1D-E). Furthermore, preliminary trajectory analyses have demonstrated the rapid decline of these proteins before treatment with the levels plateauing near the levels seen in healthy controls throughout the 52-week of study trial. Gene regulatory network analyses of the top predictors demonstrated significantly downregulated lymphocyte activation/differentiation (CD27, IL-7, IL-3, IL-16, CD83, and IL-10) and cellular migration pathways (NRP1, IL-16, PDGFB, CSF1, DDR1, FSTL1) in patients with a CR at week 12. Figure 1. Conclusions Early downregulation of specific immune pathways upon treatment precedes future clinical response in LN. Changes in serum protein expression, especially the soluble surface receptors shed upon cellular activation, at 12 weeks post-biopsy may serve as noninvasive biomarkers of 52-week treatment response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→