MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410734929 · doi:10.5539/hes.v15n3p45

Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Leadership of Chinese Higher Vocational Students

2025· article· en· W4410734929 on OpenAlex
Dawei Huang, Apiradee Jansaeng, Jiraporn Chano

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher Education Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Work Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationEntrepreneurshipMathematics educationHigher educationPedagogyPsychologySociologyBusinessEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the core competence of Chinese vocational college students' innovation and entrepreneurship leadership. According to the evaluation results, the researchers analyzed the causes of the existing problems, and put forward some suggestions for the reform of the teaching model of innovation and entrepreneurship education in higher vocational colleges in China. In this research, 287 sophomores from Guangdong College of Hotel Management in the autumn semester of 2024 are taken as samples. The Self-assessment Scale of Chinese College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ability is used as an evaluation tool, and the evaluation methods such as mean value and standard difference are adopted to obtain the comprehensive evaluation results of Chinese vocational students. The research results show that many qualities of Chinese vocational college students are in line with their age characteristics, such as self-confidence, perseverance, and ideas, but their theoretical knowledge and ability of innovation and entrepreneurship leadership need to be improved. This further shows that the traditional teaching model is no longer suitable for innovation and entrepreneurship education. After analyzing the evaluation results, the researchers believe that Timmons' entrepreneurial process theory and integrated leadership theory should be used as the theoretical basis of innovation and entrepreneurship education teaching model, and put into practice in innovation and entrepreneurship projects and competitions, so as to improve students' innovation and entrepreneurship leadership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.287
GPT teacher head0.549
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it