Active Learning-Guided Hit Optimization for the Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 WDR Domain Based on In Silico Ligand-Binding Affinities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) is the most mutated gene in familial Parkinson’s disease, and its mutations lead to pathogenic hallmarks of the disease. The LRRK2 WDR domain is an understudied drug target for Parkinson’s disease, with no known inhibitors prior to the first phase of the Critical Assessment of Computational Hit-Finding Experiments (CACHE) Challenge. A unique advantage of the CACHE Challenge is that the predicted molecules are experimentally validated in-house. Here, we report the design and experimental confirmation of LRRK2 WDR inhibitor molecules. We used an active learning (AL) machine learning (ML) workflow based on optimized free-energy molecular dynamics (MD) simulations utilizing the thermodynamic integration (TI) framework to expand a chemical series around two of our previously confirmed hit molecules. We identified 8 experimentally verified novel inhibitors out of 35 experimentally tested (23% hit rate). These results demonstrate the efficacy of our free-energy-based active learning workflow to explore large chemical spaces quickly and efficiently while minimizing the number and length of expensive simulations. This workflow is widely applicable to screening any chemical space for small-molecule analogs with increased affinity, subject to the general constraints of RBFE calculations. The mean absolute error of the TI MD calculations was 2.69 kcal/mol, with respect to the measured K D of hit compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".