MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410761699 · doi:10.1107/s2053230x2500425x

The structure of a family 168 glycoside hydrolase from the marine bacterium <i>Muricauda eckloniae</i>

2025· article· en· W4410761699 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily Knudson-Goerner, A.B. Boraston

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGlycoside hydrolaseBacteriaGlycosideStereochemistryMicrobiologyBiologyChemistryGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genome of the marine bacterium Muricauda eckloniae sp. DK169 contains an extensive polysaccharide-utilization locus that targets fucoidan from brown algae. Within this locus is a gene that encodes a putative fucoidan-degrading glycoside hydrolase (locus tag AAY42_01205) assigned to glycoside hydrolase family 168, which we call Me GH168. We present the 2.0 Å resolution X-ray crystal structure of Me GH168, demonstrating a (β/α) 8 -barrel fold. The eight loop regions joining each α-helix and β-strand surround the catalytic groove. A comparison with the structure of a GH168, Fun168A, in complex with a fragment of fucoidan (PDB entry 8ya7) revealed conservation of key residues in the catalytic site. However, structural variation in positive-subsite loop regions may recontour the active site to create differences in substrate specificity between the two GH168s. The present data provide additional structural insights into the GH168 family, particularly expanding on sequence and structure conservation (and the lack thereof) in relation to substrate interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology CommunicationsSame topicEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207