Impact of COVID-19 on Dutch General Practitioner Prenatal Primary Care: Retrospective, Observational Cohort Study Using an Interrupted Time-Series Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted primary health care-seeking behavior of the general population. The extent to which health care-seeking behavior of pregnant women in general practitioner (GP) care was affected remains largely unknown. The unique health care needs of pregnant women necessitate regular monitoring and care to ensure the well-being of expectant mothers, fetuses, and neonates, as timely interventions and screenings can profoundly influence the long-term health outcomes. Understanding how pandemic-related changes have influenced pregnant women's primary health care-seeking behavior is essential for developing targeted interventions and informing policy decisions to improve health outcomes for expectant mothers, fetuses, and neonates, both during public health emergencies and in routine health care settings. Objective: This study aims to examine the impact of different COVID-19 pandemic phases on health care-seeking behavior among pregnant women in Dutch GP practices throughout 2020 and 2021. By analyzing clinical electronic health record (EHR) GP data, we aim to evaluate the health care consumption, occurrence of pregnancy-relevant symptoms and diagnoses, and types of contact (ie, regular consultations, phone consultations, home visits, and digital consultations) during different pandemic phases. Methods: Using a retrospective cohort design, EHRs of selected pregnant women from 3 Dutch GP networks between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed, comparing 6 pandemic phases divided into 13 subphases with a prepandemic phase. Contact rates were analyzed by interrupted time-series analyses, pregnancy-relevant symptoms, and diagnoses by comparing the frequency of pregnancy-relevant International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) code registrations and type of contact by descriptive statistics. Results: In total, 10,985 pregnant women were included, yielding 39,023 patient-GP contacts. Contact rates fluctuated significantly across pandemic phases, with the sharpest declines at the onset and the end of the pandemic. Pregnancy-relevant symptoms and diagnosis in the category related to pregnancy showed the highest variability across the pandemic phases, such as an increase in the frequency of health care consumption concerning gestational diabetes mellitus and nausea or vomiting of pregnancy. Detailed statistical results are reported in the main text. Contacts for symptoms and diagnosis like digestive or urinary tract problems did not fluctuate across the pandemic phases. The number of physical contacts decreased, while telephone contacts increased. Conclusions: By analyzing EHR data from over 10,000 pregnant women, this study highlights the pandemic's impact on pregnant women's GP health care-seeking behavior, including declining health care consumption trends during the initial and end phases of the pandemic (2020-2021). The observed increase in GDM and its potential long-term effects underscore the need for enhanced public health strategies within GP practices, ensuring continuous access to prenatal care and striving for improved outcomes of expectant mothers, their fetuses, and neonates during times of pandemics and in routine health care settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".