Clinico-radiological outcomes of desmoid type-fibromatosis after discontinuing the sorafenib treatment in responders – early results from the SORASTOP study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The duration of treatment for desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF) is undefined. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of discontinuing sorafenib in responding patients with extremity DTF. We hereby report the initial findings comprising outcomes of 20 evaluable patients enrolled in this study. Methods: This prospective single-arm phase 2 Simon's 2-stage trial enrolled adults with radiologically non-progressive, pain-free (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) score <2) extremity DTF post at least 1 year of sorafenib. Sorafenib was discontinued and patients were monitored by clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination. Disease progression was defined as ≥10% increase in size plus ESAS >5 or ≥20% increase in size. The primary endpoint was a 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFR) after discontinuation. An unplanned analysis of the primary objective among 20 evaluable patients is being presented in this study. Results: = 0.04) functioning at 12 months while neurocognitive functions remained stable. Conclusion: As per the early results, stopping sorafenib can be potentially considered in responding patients with stable extremity DTF after at least 1 year of treatment. With improvement in QoL and an acceptable rate of disease progression upon stopping sorafenib, this treatment discontinuation strategy could be an important consideration in DTF management. Further analysis of the entire study cohort is warranted to establish optimal treatment duration for extremity DTF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".