MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410774335 · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2025.105020

Variable expressivity of a transmitted pathogenic KAT6B variant

2025· article· en· W4410774335 on OpenAlexaff
Pernille Axél Gregersen, Trine Østergaard Nielsen, Line Graven Lyngdorf, Casper Kruse, Michael Bayat, Philippe M. Campeau, Anne Skakkebæk

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Medical Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpressivityGeneticsComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pathogenic variants in KAT6B (Lysine acetyltransferase 6B) are associated with two clinically overlapping autosomal dominant disorders Say-Barber-Biesecker-Young-Simpson syndrome (SBBYSS) (OMIM 603736), and Genitopatellar syndrome (GPS) (OMIM 606170). More recently, the clinical spectrum of KAT6B disorders has expanded and KAT6B disorders have been suggested to consist of a spectrum of disorders with intermediate and overlapping clinical manifestations. Pathogenic variants in KAT6B mainly occur de novo, with only 3 reports of inherited variants. Here, we describe clinical and molecular findings in a three-generation Danish family with a segregating, previously unreported, pathogenic KAT6B variant. The variant is associated with a phenotype not otherwise specified (neither SBBYSS nor GPS) and with variable expressivity, adding further evidence that KAT6B disorders should be seen as a broad clinical spectrum. Furthermore, we highlight the existence of intra-familial variability and that pathogenic variants in KAT6B can be inherited from mildly affected parents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Medical GeneticsSame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207