MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

First Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Interaction Cross Section and Flux as a Function of Energy at the LHC with FASER

2025· article· en· W4410775455 on OpenAlexaff
Roshan Mammen Abraham, X. Ai, J. K. Anders, C. Antel, A. Ariga, T. Ariga, Jeremy Atkinson, F. U. Bernlochner, Tobias Boeckh, J. Boyd, L. Brenner, A. M. Burger, F. Cadoux, R. Cardella, D. Casper, Charlotte Cavanagh, X. Chen, Dhruv Chouhan, A. Coccaro, Stephane Débieux, M. D’Onofrio, Ansh Desai, Sergey Dmitrievsky, Radu Dobre, Sinead Eley, Yannick Favre, D. E. Fellers, Jonathan L. Feng, Carlo Alberto Fenoglio, D. Ferrère, Max Fieg, Wissal Filali, Elena Firu, Edward Karl Galantay, Ali Garabaglu, S. M. Gibson, S. González-Sevilla, Y. Gornushkin, C. B. Gwilliam, D. Hayakawa, M. Holzbock, S.‐C. Hsu, Z. Hu, G. Iacobucci, Tomohiro Inada, Luca Iodice, S. Jakobsen, Hans Ludwig Joos, E. Kajomovitz, H. Kawahara, Alex Keyken, Felix Kling, Daniela Köck, P. Kontaxakis, U. Köse, Rafaella Kotitsa, S. Kuehn, T. Kugathasan, L. J. Levinson, K. Li, Jinfeng Liu, Yi Liu, Margaret Lutz, J. C. MacDonald, Chiara Magliocca, Toni Mäkelä, Lawson McCoy, J. A. Mcfayden, Andrea Pizarro Medina, Matteo Milanesio, Théo Moretti, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Toshiyuki Nakano, Laurie Nevay, K. Ohashi, H. Otono, Hao Pang, L. Paolozzi, Pawan Pawan, Brian Petersen, Titi Preda, M. T. Prim, M. Queitsch-Maitland, Hiroki Rokujo, A. Rubbia, J. A. Sabater Iglesias, Osamu Sato, P. Scampoli, K. Schmieden, M. Schott, A. Sfyrla, D. Sgalaberna, M. Shamim, Savannah Shively, Y. Takubo, Noshin Tarannum, O. Theiner, E. Torrence, Oscar Ivan Valdes Martinez, S. Vasina, B. Vormwald, D. Wang, Yuxiao Wang, Eli Welch, M. Wielers, Y. Xu, Samuel Zahorec, S. Zambito, Shunliang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilInstitute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, Nagoya UniversityScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCHIST-ERATsinghua UniversitySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCERNDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Science FoundationRoyal SocietyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSimons FoundationBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungHeising-Simons Foundation
KeywordsNeutrinoPhysicsMuonParticle physicsNuclear physicsMuon neutrinoFlux (metallurgy)Neutrino detectorLuminosityLarge Hadron ColliderEnergy (signal processing)ProtonNeutrino oscillationAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Letter presents the measurement of the energy-dependent neutrino-nucleon cross section in tungsten and the differential flux of muon neutrinos and antineutrinos. The analysis is performed using proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13.6 TeV and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of (65.6±1.4) fb^{-1}. Using the active electronic components of the FASER detector, 338.1±21.0 charged current muon neutrino interaction events are identified, with backgrounds from other processes subtracted. We unfold the neutrino events into a fiducial volume corresponding to the sensitive regions of the FASER detector and interpret the results in two ways: (i) we use the expected neutrino flux to measure the cross section, and (ii) we use the predicted cross section to measure the neutrino flux. Both results are presented in six bins of neutrino energy, achieving the first differential measurement in the TeV range. The observed distributions align with standard model predictions. Using this differential data, we extract the contributions of neutrinos from pion and kaon decays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review Letters→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→