MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410778329 · doi:10.3126/kmcrj.v8i1.79069

Perception of Local People towards Youth's Migration in Dhampus, Nepal

2024· article· en· W4410778329 on OpenAlexaff
Rudra Prasad Bhattarai, Ratna Mani Nepal

Bibliographic record

VenueKMC Research Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture Food and Rural Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionPsychologyGeographySocioeconomicsGender studiesSociologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migration is a phenomenon that explicitly affects social, economic, and cultural landscapes of societies especially in developing countries. This study examined Dhampus, a suburban village in Kaski, Nepal, to explore the factors associated with youth migration. The research question was why youths migrate from Dhampus despite the region famous for domestic as well as international trekkers, hotels and restaurants, an entry point to the Annapurna Base Camp, and having the hybrid economy of agriculture, tourism and industries. This study employed exploratory research design to answer the research questions. Six in-depth interviews with key informants and two focus group discussions with local people including farmers, businessman, hoteliers, leaders of political parties. Thematic analysis of the data revealed six factors: declining agriculture, limited job opportunities, insufficient infrastructure for tourism planning, inadequate local development planning, social and economic inequality and waning trust in political institutions. Together, these factors drive young people toward urban areas and overseas. The finding of this study implies that an inclusive and sustainable rural development planning is necessary in Nepal. The plan should focus specific local contexts in order it to hold youth's in the villages. Foremost action is job creation accompanied by quality higher education centers. Appropriate infrastructure development seems an integral to the local resources mobilization and employment generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKMC Research Journal→Same topicMigration and Labor Dynamics→French-language works237,207→