Vascular Auto-Tamponade of an Infected (Mycotic) Aneurysm of the Aortic Arch and Innominate Artery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Infected aortic aneurysms pose significant therapeutic challenges, given the fragility of infected aneurysmal tissue. Mycotic aneurysms caused by Streptococcus agalactiae are rare and may progress in the absence of classical systemic infection signs. Here, we discuss the surgical management of an unusual presentation of a mycotic aneurysm and its rapid progression with no incremental changes in the patient’s symptoms. Case: A 72-year-old woman presented with subacute general deterioration and back pain. A general workup revealed a mycotic aneurysm of the aortic arch, at the level of the brachiocephalic artery. Initial CT showed a 7 × 5.5 mm pseudoaneurysm that enlarged to 41 × 26 mm within three weeks, despite clinical improvement of her presenting symptoms on antibiotics. Given that the lesion progressed, a staged procedure, consisting of a left carotid–subclavian bypass followed by proximal arch repair, was undertaken with success. Intra-operatively, a completely thrombosed innominate vein was found compressing—and likely tamponading—the pseudoaneurysm, a phenomenon that may have prevented catastrophic rupture. A Dacron graft was sewn end-to-end to the distal ascending aorta; the posterior half of this distal anastomosis incorporated the rim of the innominate artery defect to create a single hemostatic suture line. Conclusions: This case demonstrates a benign initial presentation can degenerate into a catastrophic pseudoaneurysm and how rapidly progressive thoracic infected aneurysms can develop. Heightened clinical acumen is required for accurate diagnosis. Close follow-up is also suggested based on the rapid progression experienced by our patient. Serial imaging, rather than symptomatic or laboratory response alone, should guide the timing of intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".