Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: Women's rights have become the focus of attention of many researchers and decision-makers in many countries of the world. Therefore, this topic has dominated many international and local conferences and forums to advance women, empower them, and achieve equality with men on the political, economic, and social levels. To enrich the empowerment, there are special laws passed that prescribe women’s rights and empower them internationally as well as at the domestic level. Thus, the purpose of this study is to uncover the state of empowering women in Jordan and to what degree the Jordanian legislator has facilitative the Jordanian women's empowerment by enacting or amending the new legal legislation added to the Jordanian constitution. Methods: A descriptive approach, was used to reveal to what extent Jordanian legislation is eligible to empower women in Jordan as well as integrate them into their society. In addition, Analytical approach, which was used to explore legal provisions concerning women's empowerment in Jordan. Results: The study concluded wityh a set of results among them were that Jordan has made numerous efforts in the enhancement of women’s status in different sectors and tiers. Nonetheless, women are still fewer in the political and economic sectors compared to men in many companies globally and locally. Conclusions: Jordan has taken clear steps towards empowering women. In this context, The Jordanian legislator has enacted several legal provisions that guarantee women's rights and empower them. Despite the level achieved for women in Jordan compared to many countries, there is still a gap between the reality of women achieving all their rights the level of their empowerment and the goals set by the strategic plan for women's empowerment. Therefore, Jordan is striving to achieve these goals so that women can be on the same level as men in various work affairs, similar to what developed countries have achieved in women's empowerment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".