MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410792192 · doi:10.1111/fwb.70049

Under Pressure: Macroinvertebrate Community Responses to Agriculture in Temporary Streams

2025· article· en· W4410792192 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kieran J. Gething, Romain Sarremejane, Andy House, Judy England, Tim Sykes, Rachel Stubbington

Bibliographic record

VenueFreshwater Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrent UniversityEnvironment AgencyNottingham Trent University
KeywordsSTREAMSAgricultureEcologyEnvironmental scienceInvertebrateGeographyBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Temporary streams dominate global river networks and thus often occur in catchments dominated by agricultural land uses. Drying and agriculture can exert similar stressors on aquatic communities, for example, by decreasing dissolved oxygen concentrations and increasing fine sediment deposition. However, little is known about the effects of agriculture in driving taxonomic and trait variability in temporary stream communities. Therefore, we compared the effects of agricultural land use on variability in taxonomic and functional macroinvertebrate communities in temporary and perennial streams. We used 98 macroinvertebrate samples collected from sites with perennial (n = 49) and temporary (n = 49) flow in southern England. We quantified the spatial extent of agriculture surrounding each site, assigned samples to high (n = 62) and low (n = 36) agricultural land use categories, and tested whether variability in community composition differed between perennial and temporary reaches and between high and low agricultural categories. We also tested whether the occurrence of temporary stream specialist species was influenced by agriculture. Regardless of agricultural land use, temporary reach communities were more variable than those in perennial reaches, suggesting that drying is a bigger influence than agriculture on stream communities. Within temporary reaches, communities were comparably variable regardless of agriculture, whereas agriculture increased variability among perennial reach communities. The occurrence of temporary stream specialists was unaffected by agriculture. Our results suggest that tolerance of drying by temporary stream communities confers tolerance of agriculture. This co‐tolerance of drying and agriculture may occur because temporary stream communities typically comprise species that experience agriculture and drying as comparable pressures. These species include temporary stream specialists that tolerate a wide range of environmental conditions, including drying. Although temporary stream communities and their specialist species may be co‐tolerant of drying and agriculture, these and other human pressures are intensifying, with potentially detrimental impacts on their long‐term stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFreshwater BiologySame topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyFrench-language works237,207