Phase 3 study of ivosidenib vs placebo in locally advanced or metastatic IDH1-mutant conventional chondrosarcoma untreated or previously treated with 1 systemic treatment regimen (CHONQUER).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS11582 Background: Conventional chondrosarcoma (CS) is the most common chondrosarcoma subtype, accounting for 85% to 90% of all chondrosarcoma cases. A meta-analysis of 466 patients with CS reported the detection of IDH1/2 mutations in 51.2% of patients (38.7% IDH1 and 12.1% IDH2 mutations, mutually exclusive except for one case). In a phase 1 study (NCT02073994), the long term follow-up with a data cut-off date of 15 September 2022, showed that patients with advanced conventional CS (N = 13) who were treated with the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 months, a 6-month PFS rate of 53.8%, and an overall response rate (ORR) of 23.1% including 2 partial responses and 1 complete response. Ivosidenib demonstrated manageable toxicity with mostly grade 1 or 2 treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) (Tap et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:11532). The current phase 3 CHONQUER study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ivosidenib treatment in patients with grades 1, 2 and 3 conventional CS. Methods: The CHONQUER study (NCT06127407) is a phase 3, international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of ivosidenib for patients with locally advanced or metastatic IDH1 mutant conventional CS untreated or previously treated with 1 systemic treatment regimen. Key eligibility criteria include a histopathological diagnosis of conventional CS (grades 1, 2, or 3), locally-advanced or metastatic setting not eligible for curative resection; ECOG PS 0-1; measurable disease as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1); received 0 or 1 prior systemic treatment regimen in the advanced/metastatic setting for CS; radiographic progression/recurrence of disease over a period of 6 months according to RECIST v1.1 and IDH1 gene-mutated disease confirmed by central laboratory testing with the Ion Torrent Oncomine Dx Express Test. A total of 136 patients are planned to be enrolled and will be randomized 1:1 to ivosidenib or a matched placebo control. Randomization will be stratified by disease grade (grade 1 versus 2 versus 3) and locally advanced versus metastatic disease. The primary endpoint is PFS confirmed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BIRC) in grade 1 and 2 patients. The key secondary endpoints include PFS based on BIRC for all randomized patients, overall survival (OS) (both grade 1 and 2 and all randomized patients). Other secondary endpoints include PFS by investigator, overall response, duration of response, time to response, disease control, duration of disease control, adverse events, and health-related quality of life. 92 sites from 12 countries are planned to participate, including North and South America, Europe and Asian countries. Clinical trial information: NCT06127407 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".