MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Circulating free DNA derived from active chromatin as a predictive biomarker for clinical benefit to checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies in metastatic leiomyosarcoma.

2025· article· en· W4410795933 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Diego Holanda Lopes, Hsin-Ta Wu, Abdulazeez Salawu, Lee-Anne Stayner, Katharine Dilger, Abha A. Gupta, Aaron R. Hansen, Anna Spreafico, Philippe L. Bédard, Maggie C. Louie, Lillian L. Siu, Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBiomarkerCancer researchOncologyChromatinDNAInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

11539 Background: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a common subtype of soft tissue sarcoma with a poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. LMS shows minimal benefit from monotherapy immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), however combinatorial CPI strategies may be effective in part due to tumor enrichment of epigenetic alterations. The DAPPER trial (NCT03851614) was a randomized, single center phase II study of durvalumab combined with olaparib or cediranib. Of the 30 LMS patients enrolled, 36.3% (n = 11) experienced disease stabilization or shrinkage. The present study aims to leverage a novel active chromatin cell-free DNA (cfDNA ac ) platform to investigate the epigenetic and genomic profiles of LMS patients in the DAPPER trial, with the goal of identifying biomarkers associated with clinical benefit from CPI-based therapies. Methods: Baseline plasma samples (n = 30) from LMS patients in the DAPPER trial were processed using a proprietary cfDNA ac capture assay that enriches active chromatin cfDNA. Following whole genome sequencing, univariate analysis and machine learning-based recursive feature selection were used to identify genomic features associated with clinical benefit rate (CBR, defined as RECIST v1.1 complete or partial response, or stable disease lasting > 6 months). Results: We identified 918 promoter and exon features that were significantly different (p < 0.01) at baseline and could segregate patients who achieved CBR from those who did not. Over-representation analysis of these gene features using Gene Ontology (p adj < 0.05) showed enrichment in biological pathways associated with double-strand break repair, inflammatory response, and immune response - specifically T-cell receptor activation and signaling, and macrophage homeostasis in patients with CBR. Conclusions: This study highlights the utility of cfDNA ac profiling as a non-invasive method for identifying biomarkers that predict clinical benefit from CPI-based therapy in patients with advanced LMS. Further analyses are ongoing to evaluate whether the genomic-derived features correlate with other clinical outcomes, such as progression-free survival, overall survival, and orthogonal data (e.g. tumor tissue RNA-seq).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→