MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410796369 · doi:10.1002/gj.5242

Intrinsic Role of Green Technologies and Renewable Energy: A Pathway to Mitigate Climate Change in China

2025· article· en· W4410796369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicResearch, Science, and Academia
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersPrincess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
KeywordsRenewable energyClimate changeChinaNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceBusinessEconomicsEcologyGeographyGeologyOceanographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The present study provides the nexus between green technology, renewable energy systems and sustainable economic growth in China by assessing comprehensive time series data from 1990 to 2021. It employs quantile‐on‐quantile regression and the Augmented Dickey–Fuller test to assess how policies promoting green technology and renewable energy systems impact China's sustainable economic trajectory towards building a low‐carbon economy for climate change mitigation. The results reveal that all variables become stationary at first difference, except for green technology. There is a positive correlation between green technology, renewable energy systems and sustainable economic growth. Notably, an increase in the rate of green technology and resource management efficiency tends to increase economic growth, emphasising their transformative potential for fostering sustainability. In contrast, the increase in interest rates hinders economic growth. Furthermore, inflation and gross capital formation exhibit positive associations with sustainable economic growth. Policymakers should focus on transition to a low‐carbon economy through targeted resource allocation for low‐carbon technologies and the policies promoting energy efficiency, especially in the urban and industrial sectors. The current study also identifies limitations, like data constraints, methodological challenges and policy interaction complexity. By highlighting these limitations and further exploration can assist multi‐criteria decision making and policymakers to foster green, prospect and sustainable climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it