Impaired persistence of cortical sensory adaptation following repetitive tactile stimulation in the hindlimb somatosensory cortex of Rett syndrome mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reduced response to repeated stimulation (RS) is a signature feature of sensory systems. In this study we examined cortical sensory responses to brief tactile stimulation of the foot/ankle before, during and after periods of RS in young male, young and old female mice. We compared cortical activity in wild-type (WT) mice to mice with mutation in Mecp2 that causes the neurodevelopmental disorder Rett syndrome (RTT). Intrinsic optical signal imaging (IOS) and intracortical local field potential (LFP) measurements revealed reduced cortical responses to test stimuli on the order of 40-50% after 15-min periods of RS. The time-course and magnitude of reduced IOS and LFP to tactile test-stimuli were similar in WT and RTT mice before and during application of RS. However, after cessation of RS, cortical responses remained persistently below pre-stimulation in WT while RTT mice had significantly more rapid and in some cases complete recovery with an hour of rest. LFP responses to each stimulus in a 7-stimulus test-train characteristically decline. Examining the buildup of this adaptation during test-trains revealed that while the response to the first stimulus in the test-train was generally consistent, responses to successive stimuli in the test-train declined more rapidly after application of RS. This increased adaptation during test-trains persisted in WT mice and reversed more rapidly in RTT mice suggesting that persistent cortical sensory adaptation results from enhancement of processes responsible for short-term adaptation. The lack of persistent cortical sensory adaptation in RTT mice may reflect reduced long-term plasticity within central somatosensory processing circuits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".