MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410798330 · doi:10.21037/apm-24-158

Chronic radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients: pathophysiology, prevention and management strategies, and clinical impact

2025· review· en· W4410798330 on OpenAlexaff
Molly A. Chakraborty, Shing Fung Lee, Henry C. Y. Wong, Shirley S. W. Tse, Adrian Wai Chan, Jennifer Kwan, Caroline Hircock, Charles B Simone, Edward Chow, J. Isabelle Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Palliative Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreMcMaster UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePathophysiologyBreast cancerIntensive care medicineCancerDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiation therapy (RT) is a common component of breast cancer treatment. Chronic radiation dermatitis (CRD), defined as occurring after or extending beyond 90 days following the completion of RT, can be progressive and irreversible and manifest as changes in skin pigmentation, fibrosis, telangiectasia, ulceration, necrosis, and contribute to the development of cutaneous malignancy. There is limited existing research on the incidence, management approaches, and prevention strategies for CRD. The literature that does exist reports widely varying rates of CRD, reports the various manifestations individually, uses different grading scales, and has varying follow-up durations, making comparison between studies challenging. Methods that have been reported to specifically prevent CRD include massage therapy and physical activity. As increased severity of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) may be associated with increased risk of CRD, methods to prevent ARD may also help prevent CRD. Topical corticosteroid creams currently have the greatest consensus for the prevention of ARD, but there is also evidence for barrier films such as Mepitel Film, StrataXRT, and Hydrofilm. A variety of methods have also been proposed to help manage the manifestations of CRD, including pulsed dye laser therapy for telangiectasia, flap reconstruction for ulceration, and vitamin E/pentoxifylline and fat grafting for cutaneous fibrosis. Standardization of scoring of CRD, aligning study endpoints, and further research into the prevention and management of CRD are needed, as many patients are living for years following breast RT, and CRD represents a poor cosmetic outcome that can lead to significant health problems, and can reduce quality of life. Herein, we aim to provide a comprehensive literature review of the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, prevention and management strategies, and quality of life impact of CRD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Palliative MedicineSame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207