MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410803116 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5c02609

Desulfonylative Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling of Unactivated Aryl Sulfones through Ni Catalysis

2025· article· en· W4410803116 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryusei Ohkura, Yasuyo Tahara-Tezuka, Daisuke Yokogawa, Cathleen M. Crudden, Masakazu Nambo

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanada Research ChairsMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsArylCatalysisChemistryCoupling reactionCoupling (piping)Combinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a Ni-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of simple aryl sulfones with arylboroxines through carbon–sulfonyl (C–SO 2 ) bond activation. The use of 1,5-cyclooctadiene (cod) as a ligand on Ni is essential in this cross-coupling reaction, affording unsymmetric biaryl products in good yields. The utilization of the sulfonyl moiety as both an electron-withdrawing and directing group provides highly functionalized products via regioselective and iterative transformations, which are difficult to achieve with typical leaving groups, such as aryl halides. Moreover, cyclic aryl sulfones can be employed in ring-opening cross-coupling and subsequent trapping reactions with various electrophiles, producing π-conjugated structures bearing valuable, sulfur-containing functional groups. Competition experiments reveal that the Ni-cod catalyst preferentially promotes the coupling with aryl sulfones over aryl chlorides, which is opposite the conventional reactivity of aryl electrophiles. Additionally, the sodium sulfinate released during C–SO 2 bond cleavage exhibits an unprecedented rate-accelerating effect, which is supported by mechanistic studies, control experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS CatalysisSame topicSulfur-Based Synthesis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207