MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TITANium: An open-label, global multicenter phase 1/2 study of AZD5492, a first-in-class subcutaneous CD8-guided tri-specific T-cell engager (TCE), in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies.

2025· article· en· W4410803211 on OpenAlexaff
Mazyar Shadman, Philip A. Thompson, Benjamin Heyman, Martin Hutchings, Leslie A. Lori, Junichiro Yuda, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Daniela Hoehn, Macarena Izuzquiza, Anthony R. Mato, Güllü Görgün, Robert W. Chen, John Kuruvilla

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOpen labelRefractory (planetary science)CD8OncologyMulticenter studyInternal medicineCancer researchClinical trialImmunologyAntigenMaterials scienceMetallurgyRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS7091 Background: Bispecific CD20 x CD3 TCEs are changing the treatment landscape for pts with r/r non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL); however, they are associated with immune-related toxicities, namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), which limit their use. AZD5492 is a first-in-class, humanized, asymmetric, subcutaneously-administered, trispecific monoclonal IgG1 antibody that harbors two Fab binding domains to CD20, one VHH binding domain to T-cell receptor and one VHH binding domain to a CD8 co-receptor. Preclinical data have shown that AZD5492 drives B-cell killing through preferential engagement of CD8+ T cells, with reduced CD4+ T-cell activation and associated cytokine production. Thus, AZD5492 may have a wider therapeutic index and safety advantage compared with first generation CD20 x CD3 TCEs which equally engage and activate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In an in vivo NHL model, AZD5492 showed potent antitumor activity with reduced cytokine release compared with a CD20 x CD3 comparator. TITANium is a global Phase 1/2 multicenter dose escalation (Part A) and expansion (Part B) study (NCT06542250) of AZD5492 in pts with r/r B-cell malignancies. Methods: We present the study design of Part A. Eligible pts are aged ≥18 years with histologically documented CD20+ mature B-cell neoplasm, specifically large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), with ≥1 measurable lesion (except for CLL) and r/r disease after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Pts with history of Grade ≥3 CRS or ICANS, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, Ritcher’s transformation, Burkitt’s lymphoma or Burkitt-like lymphoma are excluded. Part A will consist of two independent dose escalation groups: Part A1 will enroll pts with MCL or CLL/SLL; Part A2 will enroll pts with LBCL or FL. Dose escalation will start with pts receiving AZD5492 subcutaneously at a fixed dose per dose-level. An immune-related toxicity during Part A will trigger a double step-up strategy. Thereafter, treatment will continue for a limited duration. Each part will continue dose escalation independently, using fixed or step-up dosing. Part A will initially follow an accelerated titration design and will switch to a modified toxicity probability interval-2 design when triggered by emerging data. The primary objective is to assess safety and tolerability of AZD5492. Key secondary objectives are to evaluate preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of AZD5492. Enrollment began in September 2024 and is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06542250 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207