MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dose expansion data from iintune-1, a phase 1/2 study of the STING agonist dazostinag plus pembrolizumab as first-line (1L), in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM-SCCHN).

2025· article· en· W4410804033 on OpenAlexaff
Jérôme Fayette, Aron Popovtzer, Martin Förster, Douglas Adkins, Ye Guo, G. Lefebvre, Jacob Thomas, Fiona Collinson, Ludovic Doucet, Nathaniel Bouganim, Lei Liu, J. Bennouna, Richard C. Gregory, Cong Li, Radha Ramesh, Bingyan Wu, Jeffrey J. Raizer, Yu-Chung Huang, Ammar Sukari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabAgonistOncologyInternal medicineBasal cellCancerImmunotherapyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6020 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) such as pembrolizumab (pembro) can lead to improved outcomes and durable responses in patients (pts) with RM-SCCHN. However, only a subset of pts with RM-SCCHN experience this benefit, and an unmet need for better treatments remains. STimulator of INterferon Genes (STING) agonism enhanced the response to CPIs preclinically. Dazostinag (dazo) is a small molecule STING agonist that has shown antitumor activity and activation of innate and adaptive immune responses in pts with solid tumors in the dose escalation part of iintune-1, with a recommended dose for expansion of 5 mg in combination with pembro. We report data from the ongoing dose expansion cohort 2A of iintune-1 in the first 30 pts with incurable 1L RM-SCCHN with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, treated with dazo in combination with pembro (NCT04420884). Methods: Pts receive dazo 5 mg IV on Days 1, 8, 15 plus pembro 200 mg IV on Day 1, in 21-day cycles. Primary endpoints are safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 and duration of response (DOR). Dose optimization is planned as part of expansion. Results: As of Dec 16, 2024, 30 pts had been enrolled and received treatment. Median age was 64 years and 73% of pts were male. The most common primary tumor locations were oral cavity (n=10, 33%), oropharynx (n=8, 27%), and larynx (n=6, 20%). Median CPS score was 13.5 (range, 1–101). A median of 4.5 treatment cycles (range 1–15) were received. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in all pts (grade ≥3 in 37%); the most common were fatigue (40%), nausea (27%), cough (23%), and headache (20%). Dazo-related TEAEs occurred in 80% of pts (grade ≥3 in 13%); the most common was fatigue (30%). Cytokine release syndrome was reported in 4 pts (13%; all dazo-related and grade 1–2). TEAEs led to dazo discontinuation in 1 pt. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Among 29 response-evaluable pts, 1 had a confirmed complete response and 7 had confirmed partial responses (+2 unconfirmed), for an ORR of 34%. Median DOR was not reached. Pharmacodynamic analyses revealed biomarker changes consistent with the expected mechanism of action and dose escalation data, including induction of a STING gene signature, cytokine induction, peripheral immune cell activation and CD8+ T cell recruitment to the tumor. Analyses of changes in peripheral ctDNA pre- and post-treatment are ongoing. Conclusions: This early study of dazo 5 mg IV in combination with pembro showed a manageable safety profile with an encouraging ORR in pts with RM-SCCHN. Pharmacodynamic findings demonstrate peripheral and intratumor changes consistent with STING agonism. Clinical trial information: NCT04420884 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207