MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase 2 safety and efficacy study of PRT3789 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors and a <i>SMARCA4</i> mutation.

2025· article· en· W4410804811 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy A. Yap, Martin Gutierrez, Wade T. Iams, Víctor Moreno, Tatiana Hernandez Guerrero, Guzmán Alonso, Carlos Gomez‐Roca, Sophie Postel‐Vinay, Fabian Acker, Anna Minchom, Natasha B. Leighl, William Novotny, Chris Tankersley, Megan Henry, Sunhee Ro, Michael Chisamore, John Bridgewater

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabOncologyInternal medicineSolid tumorCancer researchImmunotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS8667 Background: Genes encoding subunits of the switch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex are often mutated in cancer (~20% of all human cancers). The SWI/SNF complex contains either SMARCA2 or SMARCA4 enzymatic subunits for ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Since SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 function as mutually exclusive catalytic subunits of the SWI/SNF complex, cells exhibiting SMARCA4 loss rely on its paralog, SMARCA2, making SMARCA2 an attractive therapeutic target. In NSCLC, SMARCA4 mutations are associated with aggressive and invasive disease. PRT3789 has been shown to increase antigen processing and presentation of unique MHC class I peptides, and increase T-cell activity and IFN-γ production in SMARCA4 -mutated cancer cells. SMARCA2 degradation by PRT3789 promoted the effects of anti-PD1 therapy in SMARCA4-deficient mouse models, and PRT3789 combined with pembrolizumab (pembro), a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, promoted cell death of SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC cells. While inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have shown remarkable clinical activity across a broad range of tumor types, some patients demonstrate an inadequate response and disease progression consistent with the natural disease course that may be tied to innate resistance mechanisms. Other patients progressed after a period of disease control, which may be associated with acquired resistance mechanisms. PRT3789 + pembro may re-sensitize resistant cancers to subsequent anti–PD(L)-1 therapy. Methods: This is an open-label, 2-part, multicenter study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of PRT3789 + pembro in patients who are resistant to prior anti–PD(L)-1 therapy. Adults with any advanced, recurrent, or metastatic solid tumor and any SMARCA4 mutation are eligible to enroll into part 1, a safety run-in to establish the initial safety of PRT3789 376 mg intravenous (IV) once weekly + pembro 200 mg IV every 3 weeks. Part 2 will target adults with advanced, recurrent, metastatic NSCLC or upper gastrointestinal cancer with a SMARCA4 loss-of-function mutation. Other key eligibility criteria include documented prior or acquired resistance to anti–PD(L)-1 therapy, or received prior standard-of-care therapy, but naive to anti–PD(L)-1 therapy due to PD-L1 negative expression. A safety review committee will evaluate dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in part 1 and advise on opening part 2 and regularly review accumulated safety data during the study. The primary endpoints are safety, tolerability, and incidence of DLTs in part 1, and overall response rate and duration of response in part 2. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, clinical benefit rate, PK, and PD of PRT3789. This study is actively recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT06682806 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207