MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A randomized phase III trial investigating platinum and taxane chemotherapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) genes (OPTION-DDR) CCTG-PR-25 NCT06439225.

2025· article· en· W4410809622 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael Kolinsky, Kim N., Sebastién J. Hotte, Michael Brundage, Michael Ong, David L. Boren, M. Neil Reaume, Alexander W. Wyatt, Wendy R. Parulekar, Keyue Ding, Mariam Jafri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of OttawaMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversityJuravinski Cancer CentreOttawa HospitalBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTaxaneMedicineProstate cancerOncologyChemotherapyInternal medicineCancerProstateCancer researchBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS5122 Background: For patients (pts) with mCRPC there are numerous treatment options including single agent docetaxel after treatment with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Despite the availability of varied treatments, overall survival (OS) for pts with mCRPC after ARPI remains poor (12-19 months). Improvements in outcomes are desperately needed. 25% of pts have alterations in DDR genes and are potentially sensitive to treatment with platinum agents. Carboplatin has been previously evaluated in smaller trials in pts with mCRPC and shows promise in patients with DDR gene alterations. PR-25 leverages standard of care testing for DDR genes to evaluate in a rigorous manner whether addition of carboplatin to docetaxel improves overall survival (OS) in pts with DDR gene alterations and mCRPC. Methods: PR25 is a phase III randomised controlled trial led by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group comparing docetaxel to docetaxel and carboplatin in pts with DDR alterations. Pts have to receive prior ARPI for mCRPC, and demonstrate radiographic or PSA progression prior to enrollment. Qualifying DDR gene alterations include: BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, ATR, BRIP1, BARD1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, ERCC2, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCL, PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include: radiographic progression free survival (PCWG3 and RECIST 1.1), PSA response, time to next systemic therapy, patient reported quality of life and economic evaluation. Statistical design: The target accrual is 236 patients over 3.25 yrs with 2 year follow-up to detect a HR of 0.65 in OS, using a 5% (2 sided) level test with power of 80%. Conduct to date: Study activation – October 2024. First patient enrolled - December 2024. Accrual to date: 2 Supported by CIHR grant #189966, NCTN grant #CA180863 and CCS grant #707213. Clinical trial information: NCT06439225 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→