MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Predictors of septic shock among BCR/ABL-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients admitted for sepsis: A nationwide study and analysis.

2025· article· en· W4410811788 on OpenAlexaff
Neelkumar Patel, Dhaval Patel, Aneri Sanepara, Dhruvkumar Gadhiya, Balkiranjit Kaur Dhillon, Saisree Reddy Adla Jala, Hemamalini Sakthivel, Kamleshun Ramphul, Suma Sri Chennapragada

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsBrampton Civic Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyeloid leukemiaSeptic shockSepsisInternal medicineMyeloidOncologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e18569 Background: Cancer patients, especially those with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), are susceptible to infections and develop sepsis, which can lead to septic shock and increased mortality. This study aims to identify the predictors of septic shock in BCR-ABL-positive CML patients hospitalized for sepsis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample, an extensive database of admission records from the United States. We focused on BCR-ABL-positive CML patients not in remission who were admitted with sepsis from 2016 to 2022. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify these patients' factors associated with septic shock. Results: Among 13,540 admissions for septicemia, 3,250 (24%) developed septic shock. The median age of patients with septic shock was 72 years, compared to 71 years in the non-shock group (p<0.01). Both sexes had similar mortality odds (aOR 1.021, 95% CI 0.753-1.385, p=0.894). Factors significantly associated with septic shock included age ≥60 years (aOR 1.278, 95% CI 1.132-1.443, p<0.01), frailty (aOR 1.353, 95% CI 1.212-1.51, p<0.001), malnutrition (aOR 1.354, 95% CI 1.186-1.546, p<0.001), liver cirrhosis (aOR 2.942, 95% CI 2.587-3.345, p<0.001), chronic kidney disease (aOR 1.161, 95% CI 1.059-1.273, p=0.001), and congestive heart failure (aOR 1.574, 95% CI 1.437-1.724, p<0.001). There were no significant sex-based differences (aOR 0.968, 95% CI 0.888-1.054, p=0.452). While Black patients had comparable odds of septic shock to Whites (aOR 1.027, 95% CI 0.902-1.168, p=0.69), Hispanics were less likely to develop septic shock (aOR 0.816, 95% CI 0.697-0.955, p=0.011). No statistical significance was found for other variables, like COPD, obesity, diabetes, metastasis, weekend admissions, or Medicaid/Private insurance status. Septic shock was associated with a more extended hospital stay (7.0 days vs. 5.0 days, p<0.01) and higher hospital charges ($90,661 vs. $50,475, p<0.01). Conclusions: Several factors, including age, frailty, malnutrition, and comorbidities such as liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure, were identified as key predictors of septic shock in BCR-ABL-positive CML patients hospitalized for sepsis. These findings have the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by helping healthcare providers triage and prioritize high-risk patients who develop septic shock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207