Survival of captive-raised light-footed Ridgway’s rails is influenced by release date and time in wild
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Captive breeding and translocation programs are an increasingly common conservation tool and management strategy used for some of the rarest and most endangered species in the world. These programs come at a high cost, and many translocation programs fail to monitor animals after release. Light-footed Ridgway’s rails (Rallus obsoletus levipes) are federally endangered marsh birds endemic to coastal wetlands of southern California and northern Mexico. Juvenile captive-raised light-footed Ridgway’s rails have been released into marshes within their U.S. range for >20 yr, but little effort has been devoted to post-release tracking of their movement and survival. We used satellite GPS transmitters to track survival of 46 juvenile captive-released and 42 juvenile wild-caught light-footed Ridgway’s rails from 2020–2022. Our results suggest that juvenile captive-released rails had lower initial daily survival probability (0.979) compared with that of juvenile wild-caught rails (0.994). Survival probability of captive-released rails increased with time in the wild, matching that of wild birds at about 100 d post-release. Survival of captive-released birds was most influenced by the date birds were released (releases in early summer had the highest survival). Our study emphasizes the importance of post-release monitoring as part of any captive breeding and translocation program and provides important insight into management strategies that may improve captive-released rail survival in the wild.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".