MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410815182 · doi:10.2138/am-2025-9816

Ertlite, NaAl3Al6(Si4B2O18)(BO3)3(OH)3O, a new mineral species of the tourmaline supergroup

2025· article· en· W4410815182 on OpenAlex
Jan Cempírek, Erik Jonsson, Lenka Skřápková, Radek Škoda, Uwe Kolitsch, Renata Čopjaková, Lee A. Groat, Anthony R. Kampf, Aaron J. Lussier, F. C. Hawthorne, Jakub Haifler, Markéta Holá, Martin Ende

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCanadian Museum of NatureUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourmalineSupergroupMineralGeochemistryGeologyMineralogyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ertlite, ideally NaAl3Al6(Si4B2O18)(BO3)3(OH)3O, is a new, very B-rich mineral of the tourmaline supergroup. It was found at two localities: the holotype in the Sahatany Valley, central Madagascar, and a cotype specimen from Sakangyi, Mogok Township, Mandalay Region, Myanmar. At both localities, the mineral occurs as a late-stage hydrothermal phase in open pockets within highly fractionated, B-rich granitic pegmatites. The holotype occurs as pink to brownish gray or near colorless euhedral crystals and aggregates, up to 10 mm in diameter, with vitreous luster, conchoidal fracture, and white streak. The mineral is uniaxial (−). Holotype ertlite has a Mohs hardness of ca. 7–8, a calculated density of 3.128 g·cm−3 and an superior compatibility index (1 − KP/KC = 0.018). Cotype ertlite has a Mohs hardness of ca. 7–8, a calculated density of 3.135 g·cm−3 and a superior compatibility index (1 − KP/KC = 0.001). Ertlite has trigonal symmetry, space group R3m, with a = 15.6509(8) Å, c = 7.0406(5) Å, V = 1493.55(19) Å3 (holotype) and a = 15.590(2) Å, c = 7.009(1) Å, V = 1475.3(4) Å3 (cotype, with the lowest unit-cell volume ever recorded for a natural tourmaline); Z = 3. The crystal structures were refined to R1 = 2.01% and 3.74%, respectively, using room-temperature data sets collected with MoKα radiation. Crystal-chemical analysis obtained using electron probe microanalysis, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and crystal structure refinement resulted in the following empirical holotype and cotype formulas, respectively: X(Na0.573Ca0.220□0.207)Σ1.000Y(Al2.760Li0.187Mn0.051Ti0.002)Σ3.000Z(Al6.000) T(Si4.526B1.419Al0.055)Σ6.000O18B(BO3)3V(OH2.669O0.331)Σ3.000W(O0.786OH0.188F0.026)Σ1.000 (holotype); X(Na0.743Ca0.109□0.146K0.002)Σ1.000Y(Al2.836Li0.144Mn0.002Fe0.010)Σ2.992Z(Al6.000) T(Si4.053B1.955)Σ6.008O18B(BO3)3V(OH)3.000W(O0.716OH0.245F0.039)Σ1.000 (cotype). Ertlite is an oxy-species that belongs to the sodic group of the tourmaline supergroup. The closest end-member compositions of valid tourmaline species are: olenite by the coupled substitution TSi4+ + VO2− → TB3+ + VOH− accompanied by the disorder exchange VO2− + WOH− → VOH− + WO2−, alumino-oxy-rossmanite by the coupled substitution X□ + TSi4+ + TAl3+ → XNa+ + 2(TB3+), and darrellhenryite by the coupled substitution YLi+ + 2(TSi4+) → YAl3+ + 2(TB3+). Ertlite was approved by the IMA-CNMNC (IMA 2023-086); the name honors the tourmaline specialist Andreas Ertl-Winand. Ertlite is closely related to synthetic excess-boron tourmalines. Holotype ertlite formed during a late stage of open pocket crystallization in a highly fractionated granitic pegmatite dike of lithium-cesium-tantalum-enriched type (LCT-type) of likely Pan-African age. Cotype ertlite crystallized in a very similar pegmatite environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it