MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adjuvant WIDER: A phase 3b trial of ribociclib (RIB) + endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment (tx) in a close-to-clinical-practice patient (pt) population with HR+/HER2− early breast cancer (EBC).

2025· article· en· W4410820157 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie L. Graff, Fátima Cardoso, Hope S. Rugo, Christine Brezden‐Masley, Gustavo Werustsky, Debasish Tripathy, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, X. Cynthia, Michael A. Danso, Yen‐Shen Lu, Gül Başaran, Mario Campone, Michelino De Laurentiis, Javier Cortés, Valarie Worthy, Melissa Gao, B. Müsel, Fen Ye, Kristyn Pantoja, Peter A. Fasching

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
KeywordsMedicineAdjuvantBreast cancerCancerClinical PracticePopulationOncologyClinical trialInternal medicineAdjuvant therapyEndocrine systemGynecologySurgeryFamily medicineHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS617 Background: The phase 3 NATALEE trial met its primary endpoint with significant invasive disease–free survival benefit with RIB + ET vs ET alone in a broad pt population with stage II/III HR+/HER2− EBC, sustained with additional follow-up at 44.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.715). The Adjuvant WIDER trial will evaluate RIB + ET in an HR+/HER2− EBC pt population that reflects pts seen in clinical practice as it has wider eligibility criteria, including an additional focus on enrolling minority pts underrepresented in NATALEE. Given the unmet need in pts with Stage II/III EBC, the results of this trial will complement existing data on benefits of RIB + ET. Methods: This phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial will evaluate, with early involvement of key pt advocacy groups, the efficacy and safety of adjuvant RIB + ET in a close-to-clinical-practice pt population with HR+/HER2− EBC. Eligible women and men aged ≥18 years with an ECOG PS of 0 to 2 and anatomic stage II/III disease (AJCC 8th ed), with additional criteria for stage IIA disease (N1 or N0 with grade 3, or grade 2 with Ki-67 ≥20% or high genomic risk), will be included. Pts will receive RIB (400 mg/d; 3 wk on/1 wk off) + ET (letrozole 2.5 mg/d, anastrozole 1 mg/d, or exemestane 25 mg/d) for 36 months, followed by ET alone as SOC per investigator’s clinical judgment. Pre/peri-menopausal women and men will receive goserelin 3.6 mg or leuprolide 3.75 mg/4 wk. Switching between ETs during study tx will be allowed in cases of unmanageable toxicity. Pts may have received (neo)adjuvant ET if initiated ≤36 months prior to enrollment. The number of pts with prior ET between 12 and 36 months will be capped at ≈30%; this cap will not be applicable to Black or African American pts. For pts with prior ET >12 months, restaging is recommended. Pts with prior CDK4/6i tx (except RIB) in the adjuvant setting for ≤6 months who discontinued due to toxicity can be included. Study tx may be held ≤28 days (or longer on agreement) to recover from RIB-related toxicity before restarting. If indicated, pts must have completed radiotherapy or chemotherapy before screening. Key exclusion criteria are distant metastases and/or recurrence and clinically significant, uncontrolled heart disease at screening. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed invasive breast cancer–free survival rate at 3 years per STEEP v2.0 criteria. Secondary endpoints include invasive disease–free survival, distant disease–free survival, distant relapse–free survival, recurrence–free interval, overall survival, quality of life, and safety. Exploratory endpoints will assess subsequent antineoplastic tx, potential mechanisms of RIB benefit/resistance to RIB + ET, and RIB efficacy/safety in Black pts. Estimated enrollment is 1400 pts globally. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05827081 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.462 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207