MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410826616 · doi:10.3390/medicina61061004

Association of Pre-Implantation Uterine Artery Doppler with Clinical Pregnancy in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4410826616 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antonios Siargkas, Areti Faka, Panagiota Kripouri, Evangelos Papanikolaou, Sofoklis Stavros, Ekaterini Domali, Dimos Sioutis, Chrysi Christodoulaki, Apostolos Mamopoulos, Ιoannis Tsakiridis, Themistoklis Dagklis

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicina · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisObstetricsGynecologyMedicineUterine arteryPregnancyReproductive technologyAssisted reproductive technologyInfertilityBiologyInternal medicineGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether pre-implantation uterine artery (UtA) Doppler measurements are associated with clinical pregnancy in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Materials and Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception until 25 March 2025 was conducted to identify relevant studies. Additional records were retrieved through grey literature searching and manual reference checks. Eligible publications were observational studies or clinical trials that evaluated UtA Doppler indices prior to embryo transfer in adult women undergoing ART. Studies were required to report on clinical pregnancy rates, while those enrolling participants under 18 years of age, lacking Doppler data, or providing no pregnancy endpoints were excluded. Three reviewers independently assessed study quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model to calculate mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was examined via Cochran’s Q and the I2 statistic. Sensitivity analyses excluded studies at high risk of bias. Results: In total, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, including a population of 3317 women. Women who achieved clinical pregnancy had a lower mean UtA pulsatility index (PI) (MD, −0.26; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.06) and a higher peak systolic velocity (PSV) (MD, 8.59; 95% CI, 2.31 to 14.87) than those who did not conceive. Subgroup analyses showed that UtA PI measured during the menstrual cycle was lower in clinical pregnancy cases (MD, −0.38; 95% CI, −0.66 to −0.10). Measurements on the day of hCG administration or the day before showed a non-significant difference in UtA PI (MD, −0.43; 95% CI, −1.03 to 0.17), while assessments on the day of embryo transfer showed no significant difference between groups (MD, −0.02; 95% CI, −0.28 to 0.24). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that lower UtA PI and higher PSV prior to embryo transfer are associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates in ART, particularly when measurements are taken during the menstrual cycle. Although these findings highlight a potential role for uterine hemodynamics in successful clinical pregnancy, UtA Doppler alone may not be a reliable predictor. Future studies should focus on earlier-cycle Doppler measurements and their integration into multifactorial models to improve prognostic accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinaSame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207