Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transformation of self in connection with space highlights a heightened sensitivity to the external world in relation to human identity. This interdependence, in which the geographical boundaries impose themselves as essential conditions for existence, intersects with identity, which perpetually seeks to distinguish itself from others and establish a sense of belonging. These dual aspects offer a unique perspective on how space is perceived. The DNA of selfhood lies in sensitivity, in the capacity to connect with others and, crucially, with the land itself. This exploration delves into the theme of exile, identifying and analysing the characteristics of voluntary or involuntary departure onto foreign soil through a literary lens. This study specifically emphasises the intersection of physical and psycho-emotional exile, focusing on the lives of Romanian female writers who have experienced a rupture of self and homeland. Romanian writers Felicia Mihali, Liliana Lazăr, and Alexandra Badea have chosen the French cultural sphere as a new direction for their lives, whether on Canadian or French soil. Their novels serve as spaces of refuge, creating a necessary suspended territory that allows them to develop the capacity to adapt to a new life with different customs and habits. This study emphasizes the theme of exile within an original, feminine Romanian universe that demonstrates resilience and a keen understanding of human complexity, all while facing alienation. These three authors have forged a space for a rich, new literature bridge to neo-sensitivity that combines a profound past with hope for the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".